Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add shibing624/agentica --skill multi-agentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shibing624/agenticaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shibing624/agentica/multi-agent)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shibing624/agentica/multi-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shibing624/agentica/multi-agent.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.01763 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00881 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00353 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00176 |
Grade A, and why
multi-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Working with other agents
Three mechanisms, and they are not interchangeable. Pick by what you need back, not by how big the job feels.
task |
delegate |
a second CLI in tmux | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Runs in | your process | its own process, headless | its own terminal |
| You get back | the subagent's answer | the worker's final answer | messages, when it sends them |
| Can write files | no, read-only | yes | yes |
| Parallel | yes — several in one message | yes, a few at once | start several sessions |
| Human can watch or join | no | no | yes, attach to the pane |
| Outlives you | no | no | yes, until killed |
| Cost | cheap aux model each | a whole session each | a whole session each |
taskfor reading and reporting: explore, research, review. Cheapest, and the default way to run workers in parallel — issue severaltaskcalls in one message. Parallelism is not a reason to reach fordelegateor a second CLI.delegatefor a self-contained job you want the answer to. It is a full session with its own context window, tracked like a background process.- A second CLI when the work needs a place a human can look at and take over: a long second workstream, a different repo or worktree, a job the user wants to supervise. This is the only one that survives you.
Do not reach for the second CLI when task or delegate would do. It is the
most expensive option and the only one that leaves something running.
This session moving itself into a checkout of the same repo is the
worktree skill (the worktree tool), not a second process.
Starting a second CLI
Requires tmux (command -v tmux). Everything below is one execute call.
tmux new-session -d -s docs-worker -c ~/code/myrepo-docs agentica
Then confirm it came up with list_agents - it publishes itself within a
couple of seconds.
Four things decide whether this goes well:
- The directory is the name. A session's addressable name comes from its
working directory, so
-c ~/code/myrepo-docsis what makes it show up asmyrepo-docs-4finstead of something unreadable. There is no flag to name a session. Choose the directory for the name you want. - Give it its own directory. A CLI started this way runs with tools enabled and nobody there to approve anything. Point it at a git worktree or a separate checkout unless you specifically intend two agents editing the same files.
- Choose the worker's model with a profile, not a model name.
--profile <name>runs that session on a saved profile - provider, endpoint and key together - and writes nothing, so the user's own session is unaffected.--model_name Xonly moves the model within the current endpoint, so it cannot reach another provider. Profile names come from~/.agentica/config.yaml; a name that does not exist stops the worker immediately rather than silently falling back. - Tell the user it exists. Give them the attach command -
tmux attach -t docs-worker, detach withCtrl+B D. A worker nobody knows about is a worker nobody can rescue.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +14 lines 159a0cd0f648
- 7d ago First seen · 124 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A cb898ca5985b
multi-agent is a skill published in the GitHub repository shibing624/agentica (351 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,763 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
dcf-model
DCF valuation: free cash flow projections, WACC, terminal value, sensitivity analysis.
interactive-dashboard
Interactive web dashboards: stock trackers, sector heatmaps, portfolio monitors — served via preview URL.
comps-analysis
Comparable company analysis: operating metrics, valuation multiples, peer benchmarking.
initiating-coverage
Full equity research initiation: company research, financial model, valuation, charts, 30-50 page report.
html-report
Self-contained styled HTML reports written to the task directory: PDF-exportable research documents with inline data, charts, and theme-aware CSS.
inline-widget
Inline HTML widgets: charts, dashboards, data tables rendered directly in the chat via ShowWidget.