Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/dynamic-verificationnpx skills add ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe --skill dynamic-verificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShieldNet-360/secure-vibeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/dynamic-verification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/dynamic-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/dynamic-verification.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00061 | $0.02787 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01393 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00557 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00279 |
Grade A, and why
dynamic-verification scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- **command-injection** — blind: `oob_listener` + an out-of-band `curl` callback in How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 192 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verify Findings
Rules (for AI agents)
ALWAYS
- Treat a static-analysis or LLM-review hit as a candidate, not a vulnerability, until a probe with a deterministic oracle confirms it against a live target.
- Prefer an oracle that proves server-side behaviour over one that inspects the response text: out-of-band callbacks (SSRF, blind command injection, XXE) and timing deltas (blind SQLi, command injection) catch blind bugs that leave no trace in the body.
- Re-confirm any timing-based result a second time before trusting it — one slow response is noise, a repeatable delay over baseline is signal.
- For reflected oracles (XSS, SSTI), require the dangerous form: XSS confirms only when the payload comes back UNESCAPED; SSTI confirms only when the arithmetic is EVALUATED (the product appears as a standalone number and the raw expression does not).
- Pin file-read oracles (path traversal) to a content signature of a known system
file (
root:…:0:0:from/etc/passwd,[fonts]fromwin.ini), never to a generic 200/404. - Drive the probe yourself with SecureVibe's scope-gated primitives:
http_probe(send one crafted request, read status/headers/body/timing) andoob_listener(allocate a callback URL, poll for blind hits). They fire only at a target the operator authorized — otherwise they return a dry-run plan and send nothing. - Reach past
http_probefor what it cannot prove: use your own headless browser for XSS execution-proof and DOM-based XSS, and your own shell (seelist_external_tools) for heavyweight scanners. SecureVibe ships the light primitives; the heavy tools are yours. - When a verdict turns out wrong (a "confirmed" that is actually benign, or a
"refuted" that was real), root-cause why the oracle misled you before moving
on. If it was a target-specific PoC flaw (payload filtered, sink not reached,
timing threshold, OOB unreachable) → fix the PoC and re-probe. If this skill's
guidance was itself wrong (bad oracle, mis-mapped class, missing caveat) →
record it with
propose_skill_updateso the knowledge is fixed, not just this run. - Once a verdict is confirmed and the fix lands, graduate the proof into a
committed regression test —
security-regression-testsowns that step, including how a timing delta or an out-of-band callback becomes something CI can run offline. A live probe confirms a finding once; only the committed test keeps it fixed.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 192 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A f446b831ba6f
dynamic-verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe (22 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 2,787 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
documenter-vitepress
Use when setting up or developing a Julia based documentation site with DocumenterVitepress.jl. Also use when the user mentions DocumenterVitepress, VitePress for Julia docs, or wants to preview docs locally with hot reload.
agent-teacher
Teach a concept through a runnable code example plus a structured walkthrough, instead of a wall of definitions. Trigger whenever the user wants to understand a technical concept — phrases like "解释一下 X / X 是什么 / 教我 X / X 怎么工作 / 这个 X 是啥 / 我不太懂 X", or "explain X / what is X / teach me X / how does X work / help me…
offensive-crypto-attacks
Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and…
offensive-c2-frameworks
Command and Control framework deployment, configuration, and operational tradecraft for red team engagements. Covers Cobalt Strike (malleable C2 profiles, Beacon types HTTP/HTTPS/DNS/SMB, Beacon Object Files for in-memory execution, sleep and jitter tuning, named pipe pivoting), Sliver (implant generation across…
offensive-parameter-pollution
HTTP parameter pollution (HPP) checklist: duplicate parameter injection, backend vs frontend parsing differences, WAF bypass via HPP, server-side vs client-side HPP, and practical exploitation patterns. Use when testing web applications for parameter handling flaws.
offensive-z-wave
Z-Wave attack methodology — sniffing with Z-Force / EZ-Wave / RTL-SDR + ZniffMobile, S0 (legacy) network-key derivation flaw and key reuse, S2 (modern) ECDH commissioning analysis, replay/injection on unauthenticated nodes, default-key brute-force on test deployments, and home-automation hub pivots. Use when targeting…