Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/error-handling-securitynpx skills add ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe --skill error-handling-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShieldNet-360/secure-vibeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/error-handling-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/error-handling-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/error-handling-security.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00067 | $0.01436 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00718 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00287 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00144 |
Grade A, and why
error-handling-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Error-Handling Security
Rules (for AI agents)
ALWAYS
- Catch exceptions at the boundary — HTTP handler, RPC method, message consumer —
and decide there what crosses to the client and what stays server-side. Record
the failure with a correlation ID under
logging-security's policy; do not bypass its redaction rules to attach "full context", which is how request bodies, cookies and tokens end up in logs. - Put only client-actionable information in an external error: a stable error code, a short human-readable message, and the correlation ID. Anything the caller cannot act on belongs in the log entry that shares that ID.
- Keep responses consistent within an error class, and make security-equivalent
outcomes externally indistinguishable. Different classes may and should differ —
400 VALIDATION_FAILED,401,403,409,429are not a finding. What must not differ is a pair of outcomes whose distinction reveals protected state: whether an account exists, whether a record the caller may not see is present.auth-securityowns making the login paths cost the same; this rule owns what they return. - Disable developer error pages and detailed exception rendering in every
non-development environment, and route unhandled errors through the framework's
production error handler. This is a wiring decision, not the same thing as an
environment variable reading
production— the setting and its name differ per framework, andreferences/framework-error-pages.mdhas them. - Render every external error through one helper, so the sanitization rules live in a single place instead of being re-derived at each handler.
- Consult
api-securityfor the status code and response envelope,logging-securityfor the internal record, andauth-securityfor making two authentication failures cost the same. This skill owns one decision — what crosses the boundary.
NEVER
- Serialize exception or debug internals into an external response: stack traces, SQL fragments and constraint names, filesystem paths, internal hostnames, dependency or framework versions.
- Silently swallow an unexpected exception — a bare
except: pass,catch {},rescue nil. Let it reach the nearest designated error boundary, which logs it and converts it to a sanitized response. A narrowly-typed, commented suppression of an expected condition is fine; the finding is the broad or unexplained one. - Withhold client-actionable validation detail in order to make the API harder to
explore, or smuggle server state into it. Which field failed and why is the
public contract — that is what RFC 9457 problem details and the GraphQL
errorsarray are for — and it belongs in the response. Record existence, authorization state, and SQL or schema internals are not the contract and do not.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 112 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 8ed08f3f4d5a
error-handling-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe (22 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,436 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
documenter-vitepress
Use when setting up or developing a Julia based documentation site with DocumenterVitepress.jl. Also use when the user mentions DocumenterVitepress, VitePress for Julia docs, or wants to preview docs locally with hot reload.
agent-teacher
Teach a concept through a runnable code example plus a structured walkthrough, instead of a wall of definitions. Trigger whenever the user wants to understand a technical concept — phrases like "解释一下 X / X 是什么 / 教我 X / X 怎么工作 / 这个 X 是啥 / 我不太懂 X", or "explain X / what is X / teach me X / how does X work / help me…
offensive-crypto-attacks
Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and…
offensive-parameter-pollution
HTTP parameter pollution (HPP) checklist: duplicate parameter injection, backend vs frontend parsing differences, WAF bypass via HPP, server-side vs client-side HPP, and practical exploitation patterns. Use when testing web applications for parameter handling flaws.
offensive-z-wave
Z-Wave attack methodology — sniffing with Z-Force / EZ-Wave / RTL-SDR + ZniffMobile, S0 (legacy) network-key derivation flaw and key reuse, S2 (modern) ECDH commissioning analysis, replay/injection on unauthenticated nodes, default-key brute-force on test deployments, and home-automation hub pivots. Use when targeting…
seo
Optimize for search engine visibility and ranking. Use when asked to "improve SEO", "optimize for search", "fix meta tags", "add structured data", "sitemap optimization", or "search engine optimization".