frontend-security

frontend-security is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe. It costs 86 tokens per session (2,364 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A set of browser security rules for code that creates web pages or user interfaces. It covers unsafe text, links, browser settings, content policies, embedded frames, and messages between pages.

In plain words
What is it for?
Writing safer HTML, JSX, Vue, or Svelte templates; handling user-controlled data; configuring browser security headers; and validating frames or page-to-page messages.
Why use it?
It reduces common risks such as cross-site scripting, unsafe links, browser property spoofing, and overly broad access for embedded content.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Writing safer HTML, JSX, Vue, or Svelte templates; handling user-controlled data; configuring browser security headers; and validating frames or page-to-page messages.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/frontend-security
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe --skill frontend-security
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for frontend-security

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/frontend-security/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/frontend-security)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/frontend-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/frontend-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for frontend-security

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/frontend-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/frontend-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 86 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,364 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00086 $0.02364
Opus 5.5 $0.00034 $0.00946
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00017 $0.00473
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00236

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 333ca258e51f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

frontend-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/frontend-security/SKILL.md · 157 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 157 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Frontend Security

Rules (for AI agents)

ALWAYS

  • Render untrusted data through the framework's ordinary text interpolation, which escapes for the output context. Do not reach for a raw-HTML API merely to display user data. Where rich HTML genuinely must be rendered, put it through a maintained sanitizer (DOMPurify) with an explicit allowlist first.
  • Validate URL-bearing attributes per sink, not against one global scheme list. A navigation target (href, action, formaction, an <iframe src>) and an image source do not share a trust model: javascript: is never acceptable anywhere, while a narrowly constrained data:image/… or blob: may be exactly what an image sink requires. Decide the permitted schemes for each sink and check against that list.
  • Read security-sensitive configuration and control-flow values from lexical variables or an object you own — never from a named window / document property (window.config, document.redirectTo, an implicit global). The browser exposes elements by id and name as named properties, so injected markup can shadow the value your code expected. An explicit getElementById() lookup is not the problem; trusting an ambient global is. Type-check what you read before using it in a privileged way.
  • Build the Content-Security-Policy around a nonce or hash as the trust root: script-src 'nonce-{value}' 'strict-dynamic'; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'none'. Keeping 'self' beside the nonce means every same-origin script is still trusted — that is a host-allowlist policy wearing a nonce, which may be the right trade-off but is not a strict CSP, so do not call it one. Generate the nonce from a CSPRNG afresh for every HTML response, and apply it only to scripts the server itself authorizes.
  • Where you deploy Trusted Types, enforce require-trusted-types-for 'script' and restrict which policies may exist with the trusted-types directive. The first makes DOM sinks demand a typed value; without the second, any code can mint a pass-through policy (createHTML: s => s) and the guarantee is gone. Keep policies few, named, and centrally reviewed.
  • Load third-party scripts and stylesheets from version-pinned, immutable URLs with integrity="sha384-…" and crossorigin="anonymous". A hash pinned against a mutable URL breaks the page the first time the provider ships a legitimate update, which is how integrity checks come to be quietly deleted. If a provider cannot offer stable bytes with CORS, self-host rather than drop SRI.
  • Sandbox every <iframe>, starting from no capability tokens and adding only what the embedded content needs. Do not combine allow-scripts with allow-same-origin: together they let the framed document reach the parent and remove its own sandbox attribute, so the sandbox stops meaning anything. If the content genuinely needs both, isolate it on a separate origin instead.
  • On postMessage, name an explicit targetOrigin when sending — never * — and on receipt verify event.origin against an allowlist, validate the message's shape before reading any field, and where the channel expects one particular frame, check event.source as well. Origin, schema and sender are three separate checks.
  • Set X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff, Referrer-Policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin or stricter, Permissions-Policy dropping unused features, and Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy: same-origin to sever the opener relationship at the document level. Remove framework version banners here too (X-Powered-By, a detailed Server). Note that no-referrer-when-downgrade is weaker than the current browser default — configuring it is a step backwards.
  • Send HSTS on production HTTPS. Add includeSubDomains only after confirming every subdomain serves HTTPS, and preload only as a deliberate, hard-to-reverse commitment for the registrable domain: the token makes a domain eligible for the preload list, it does not enrol it, and reversing it is slow.
  • Keep authentication secrets out of JavaScript-readable storage — no access tokens, refresh tokens, JWTs, or sensitive personal or business data in localStorage or sessionStorage, where a single XSS reads all of it — and clear authenticated client-side state on logout. Server-issued session cookies are the alternative: Secure, HttpOnly, an application-appropriate SameSite, and the __Host- prefix for host-only cookies at Path=/. auth-security owns issuing them; this rule exists so a frontend review recognises an auth value that has escaped into JavaScript's reach.

Read the full file on GitHub · 157 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 157 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 333ca258e51f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

frontend-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe (22 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 2,364 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.