Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe --skill logging-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShieldNet-360/secure-vibeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/logging-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/logging-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/logging-security/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/logging-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/logging-security.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.01693 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00677 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00339 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00169 |
Grade A, and why
logging-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Logging Security
Rules (for AI agents)
ALWAYS
- Decide what is safe to log at the call site, and log a reference rather than a value: an id, a hash, a type, a count. A redactor is the last net, not the design — it matches field names and known patterns, so it cannot see personal data sitting inside an assembled string. A formatted notification body, a templated message, an exception with interpolated arguments: the name and the address are in the prose, in no named field, matching no pattern. Nothing downstream will catch that.
- Run a redactor at the sink anyway, for the cases the call site missed:
credential-shaped values,
AuthorizationandCookieheaders, query strings carrying tokens, and the personal-data patterns inrules/redaction_patterns.json.secret-detectionowns which literals count as a credential; this rule is that the redactor exists and runs before anything leaves the process. - Log in a structured format (JSON or logfmt) with stable field names —
timestamp,service,version,level,trace_id,span_id,request_id,event, anduser_idwhen there is an authenticated one. Structure is what makes redaction, retention, and access control expressible per field instead of per line. - Neutralize user-controlled strings before they enter a log record. Line injection
(CWE-117) is the classic case — a
\nor\rlets an attacker forge a whole record — but structured logging moves the problem: a value that parses as JSON can inject fields into the ingested document, and ANSI escape sequences (\x1b[) are interpreted by the terminal of whoever reads the log. Encode the value; do not concatenate it into the line. - Record security-relevant events as immutable audit records: authentication success and failure, MFA challenges, password and role changes, permission grants and revocations, data export, administrative action. These carry longer retention and stricter access than operational logs, and they are the reason failed logins must keep being written even when someone calls them noise.
- Treat read access to the log store as access to the data inside it. A centralized store aggregates every tenant's records, so grant it like production data access — named principals, reviewed, audited — not like an observability convenience handed to everyone who might want to debug something.
- Set retention per data category — short for debug, long for audit — and make it executed, not declared. A retention or deletion policy that no job enforces looks identical to one that works, right up to the point someone asks for evidence.
- Alert on the log pipeline itself: a service that stops logging, and volume that departs sharply from its own baseline in either direction. Calibrate the threshold against that service's normal traffic rather than a fixed multiple — a job that runs hourly and a request path have nothing in common.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 125 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 816368c2aca3
logging-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe (22 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,693 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-engineering-toolkit
6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.
ai-agent-evaluation-benchmarking
Autonomous AI agent benchmark evaluation register: task completion rates, planning accuracy, tool invocation precision, and cost benchmarks.
ai-agent-tool-routing
Autonomous AI agent tool router register: schema registration, runtime parameter coercion, idempotency keys, and error recovery policies.
ai-prompt-regression-testing
Prompt engineering regression test matrix register: baseline outputs, semantic drift thresholds, judge evaluations, and golden dataset.
documenter-vitepress
Use when setting up or developing a Julia based documentation site with DocumenterVitepress.jl. Also use when the user mentions DocumenterVitepress, VitePress for Julia docs, or wants to preview docs locally with hot reload.
agent-teacher
A teaching aid that explains technical ideas with a small runnable code example and a guided walkthrough. It is meant for learning how something works, not fixing existing code.