Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe --skill supply-chain-securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShieldNet-360/secure-vibeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/supply-chain-security)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/supply-chain-security"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shieldnet-360/secure-vibe/supply-chain-security.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00078 | $0.01713 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00856 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00343 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00171 |
Grade A, and why
supply-chain-security scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Supply Chain Security
Rules (for AI agents)
ALWAYS
- Verify the identity of a new dependency before adding it: registry metadata, repository URL, maintainer set, and provenance checked against the signer you expect. Name-similarity screening opens the question; it never answers it.
- Query the bundled malicious-package data before adding any dependency —
check_dependency,check_typosquatandlookup_vulnerabilityread it, this file cannot. Match on ecosystem, normalized name and affected version range; an active match on the resolved version blocks. - Treat package age, download volume, maintainer count and activity as risk signals, never as proof of trust. Defaults: a verified maintainer signal within 90 days of a package identity's first publication, plus a documented reason within 30 days.
- Lock the resolution graph for anything you deploy — commit the lockfile, install
frozen in CI (
npm ci,--frozen-lockfile,pip --require-hashes,cargo --locked). Lock what you deploy, range what you publish: a library's dependency metadata needs compatibility ranges. - Restrict where packages resolve from, so an internal-only identifier cannot come
from a public registry. Use the ecosystem's own mechanism — npm scope-to-registry,
Gradle
exclusiveContent, a single authoritative index for Python, which has no scope isolation at all. - Treat install and build hooks (
postinstall,setup.pyand modern build backends,build.rs) as arbitrary code execution. Review them, and run dependency builds in an isolated least-privileged builder — most ecosystems ship no install sandbox. - Triage vulnerabilities on severity, exploitability, deployment context, reachability where the tooling genuinely supports it, and fix availability together. A material vulnerability with no published fix needs mitigation or a recorded risk acceptance, not a pass.
- Never carry reachability or dev-only reasoning across to a suspected malicious
package or build-time compromise. A hostile
postinstallalready ran in your build environment with your CI credentials, whatever production imports. - Surface trust-boundary changes on any update regardless of version number: a
maintainer or ownership change, a new or changed install hook, a source transition,
a provenance regression.
cicd-securityowns the approval policy that acts on it. - Track bundled runtimes and engines (Electron, CEF, Chromium, system WebView, a JRE) against upstream support windows and advisories directly. Wrapper-package scanners match the wrapper version and can report clean while the engine is unpatched.
- Protect your own release channel: restrict publish privileges, verify updates against a trusted signing identity or update framework, and reject stale or downgraded releases. A checksum served beside the artifact is not authentication.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 132 lines · 78 tokens per session scan A 4e5ec360c5d4
supply-chain-security is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe (22 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 78 tokens to every session and 1,713 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
documenter-vitepress
Use when setting up or developing a Julia based documentation site with DocumenterVitepress.jl. Also use when the user mentions DocumenterVitepress, VitePress for Julia docs, or wants to preview docs locally with hot reload.
agent-teacher
A teaching aid that explains technical ideas with a small runnable code example and a guided walkthrough. It is meant for learning how something works, not fixing existing code.
offensive-crypto-attacks
Systematic methodology for identifying and exploiting cryptographic implementation weaknesses in real-world applications. Covers padding oracle attacks against CBC-mode ciphers with PKCS7 padding (Vaudenay's original attack through modern padbuster automation), ECB mode exploitation including block cut-and-paste and…
offensive-c2-frameworks
Command and Control framework deployment, configuration, and operational tradecraft for red team engagements. Covers Cobalt Strike (malleable C2 profiles, Beacon types HTTP/HTTPS/DNS/SMB, Beacon Object Files for in-memory execution, sleep and jitter tuning, named pipe pivoting), Sliver (implant generation across…
offensive-parameter-pollution
HTTP parameter pollution (HPP) checklist: duplicate parameter injection, backend vs frontend parsing differences, WAF bypass via HPP, server-side vs client-side HPP, and practical exploitation patterns. Use when testing web applications for parameter handling flaws.
offensive-z-wave
Z-Wave attack methodology — sniffing with Z-Force / EZ-Wave / RTL-SDR + ZniffMobile, S0 (legacy) network-key derivation flaw and key reuse, S2 (modern) ECDH commissioning analysis, replay/injection on unauthenticated nodes, default-key brute-force on test deployments, and home-automation hub pivots. Use when targeting…