Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to shinpr/agentic-code. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shinpr/agentic-code/main/.agents/skills/integration-e2e-testing/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shinpr/agentic-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shinpr/agentic-code/integration-e2e-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shinpr/agentic-code/integration-e2e-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shinpr/agentic-code/integration-e2e-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shinpr/agentic-code/integration-e2e-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shinpr/agentic-code/integration-e2e-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00348 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00139 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00070 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
integration-e2e-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Integration and E2E Test Implementation and Review Rules
Implementation Rules
Behavior Verification
| Step Type | Verification Target |
|---|---|
| Trigger | Reproduce in test setup (Arrange) |
| Process | Intermediate state or function call |
| Observable Result | Final output value (return value, error message, log output) |
Pass Criteria: Test passes if "observable result" is verified as return value or mock call argument
Integration Test Mock Boundaries
| Judgment Criteria | Mock | Actual |
|---|---|---|
| Part of test target? | No → Can mock | Yes → Actual required |
| External network communication? | Yes → Mock required | No → Actual recommended |
E2E Test Execution Conditions
- Execute only after all components are implemented
- Do not use mocks (full system integration required)
Review Criteria
Skeleton and Implementation Consistency
| Check | Failure Condition |
|---|---|
| Behavior Verification | No assertion for "observable result" |
| Verification Item Coverage | Listed verification items not included in assertions |
| Mock Boundary | Internal components mocked in integration test |
Implementation Quality
| Check | Failure Condition |
|---|---|
| AAA Structure | Arrange/Act/Assert separation unclear |
| Independence | State sharing between tests, execution order dependency |
| Reproducibility | Depends on date/random, results vary |
| Readability | Test name and verification content don't match |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 50 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A f6ec68ea1434
integration-e2e-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository shinpr/agentic-code (50 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 348 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-production-validator
Agent skill for production-validator - invoke with $agent-production-validator.
agent-tester
Agent skill for tester - invoke with $agent-tester.
screen-reader-testing
Test web applications with screen readers including VoiceOver, NVDA, and JAWS. Use when validating screen reader compatibility, debugging accessibility issues, or ensuring assistive technology support.
e2e-testing-patterns
Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build reliable test suites that catch bugs, improve confidence, and enable fast deployment. Use when implementing E2E tests, debugging flaky tests, or establishing testing standards.
nexent-daily-test
A procedure for running Nexent daily, full-layer tests on a self-hosted Ubuntu machine. Nexent is tested across separate layers such as unit, service, AI runtime, and browser journeys, with results and evidence kept locally.
tfp-verification
Generate a deterministic report for disposable executor acceptance tests.