Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add shinpr/codex-workflows --skill coding-rulesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shinpr/codex-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shinpr/codex-workflows/coding-rules)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shinpr/codex-workflows/coding-rules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shinpr/codex-workflows/coding-rules/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shinpr/codex-workflows/coding-rules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shinpr/codex-workflows/coding-rules.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00933 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00373 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
coding-rules scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 70 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Coding Rules
Reference
Read references/typescript.md only for TypeScript used in web frontend work, including React applications. It does not apply to backend or non-web TypeScript. Read references/security-checks.md when the change crosses an input, authorization, secret, persistence, or output boundary.
Source Order
Follow, in order:
- User-required outcome, explicit constraints, repository rules, and actual consumer contracts
- Task, acceptance criteria, Design Doc, ADR, and Work Plan as the current implementation plan
- Representative repository patterns
- Language/framework defaults
Use a sourced project contract in preference to generic best practice. When a planned mechanism is unnecessary or incorrect, preserve user outcomes and explicit constraints while reducing it: document passage and a generated AC do not make that mechanism mandatory. Keep the affected plan and proof aligned with the selected reduction.
Minimal Design Surface
Deliver the current requirement with the least justified total complexity. Before detailing new state, fields, modes, abstractions, or component splits, establish what required result a direct implementation cannot deliver. Evidence of a possible benefit makes the addition a candidate; retain it only when necessary now and worth its total lifecycle cost over subtraction or reuse.
Private local implementation details and test fixtures are not new design surface. If an element matches both categories, treat it as design surface. If several sufficient options remain, prefer the one with lower lifecycle cost.
Contract and Boundary Safety
- Preserve contracts required by remaining consumers and explicit user constraints; authorized removal includes the retired entry point and its unused implementation. Absence of repository call sites does not establish absence of external consumers. Resolve uncertainty only when it changes the removal or compatibility decision.
- Validate untrusted input at the boundary and encode output for its destination. Untrusted input includes request data, external service responses, model or tool output, and stored data whose writer is untrusted or whose consumer needs a guarantee the store does not make.
- When a change alters a boundary where external content or model output selects a tool's action, target, or destination, verify that those values cannot exceed the operation scope and access rights already granted to the caller.
- Propagate or handle errors with useful context and keep failures observable.
- Keep secrets and sensitive values out of source, client bundles, errors, and logs.
- Use parameterized data access and verify authorization at resource access points when applicable.
- For persistent or shared state, verify when partial, stale, committed, and rollback-only states become observable.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago Changed · +1 lines 144bcb955dfb
- 1mo ago Changed 87e5a20ddabf
- 1mo ago First seen · 69 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A c0a10fd21a55
coding-rules is a skill published in the GitHub repository shinpr/codex-workflows (39 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 933 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
chrome-cdp
Drive a headless Chrome over the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP) for browser QA — navigate, click, fill forms, read the DOM/accessibility tree, screenshot, and assert. Use whenever a task requires loading a web page and interacting with it like a user. Chrome is launched by a bash step (recipe below); this skill…
cross-model-review
A second-opinion code review that asks a different AI model to independently inspect a change, then compares both reviews. It focuses on logic, security, consistency, and omissions.
gitnexus
A code-graph analysis add-on for examining an existing codebase, including symbols, call paths, execution flows, and effects across repositories. It can query GitNexus through its command-line or MCP interfaces.
recipe-front-review
Reviews completed frontend implementation for governing-source compliance, scope economy, repository quality, and security, then applies user-approved React corrections.
new-skill
Scaffold a new brooks-lint analysis skill so it passes npm run validate and npm run evals on the first try — generates skills/{name}/SKILL.md (with the mandatory "Do NOT trigger for:" clause and a Process section citing guide step ranges) plus skills/{name}/{name}-guide.md (sequentially numbered steps), then appends…
brooks-sweep
Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user…