Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ShiroRyu9/community-ops-kit --skill community-ops-automation-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShiroRyu9/community-ops-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shiroryu9/community-ops-kit/community-ops-automation-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shiroryu9/community-ops-kit/community-ops-automation-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shiroryu9/community-ops-kit/community-ops-automation-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shiroryu9/community-ops-kit/community-ops-automation-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shiroryu9/community-ops-kit/community-ops-automation-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00077 | $0.01433 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00717 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00287 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
community-ops-automation-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 156 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Community Ops Automation Workflow
Overview
Use this skill to turn repeated community-ops work into a safe automation workflow. The default model is:
repeated task -> durable input -> automated collection/draft/check
-> human approval gate -> bounded execution -> read-back verification
-> state writeback -> review/update
Automation should reduce repeated labor and improve review quality. Keep public, financial, permission, reward, role, and official-claim actions under explicit human approval.
Read platform-agent-patterns.md when the workflow spans an operator, AI skill, scheduler, bot, API, or platform integration.
Project Inputs
Get the exact repeated action, input source, durable source of truth, tools or platform adapters, existing permission scope, trigger or frequency, approval owner, expected output, completion evidence, retry limit, and stop conditions from the user or approved project documentation.
The skill supplies the handoff and verification method. It does not include a configured bot, scheduler, API, channels, permissions, credentials, or standing approval. Never borrow integrations or targets from examples. Do not request or store tokens, webhook URLs, passwords, or unnecessary private data; refer to existing secure configuration by name or controlled path.
Workflow
1. Name The Repeated Task
Start by identifying the actual operator action:
- collect community signals;
- prepare a daily or weekly report;
- draft activity/reminder/result copy;
- compare skill versions or stale modules;
- update a local status board;
- prepare a creator or high-value user follow-up list;
- check risk, permissions, rewards, or benefit claims.
Do not automate a vague goal such as "increase engagement." Turn it into a concrete repeated task first.
2. Split The Workflow
For each task, define:
- inputs: channels, posts, files, reports, metrics, user-provided notes, or prior skill files;
- source of truth: the durable record that owns the latest confirmed state;
- allowed automation: read, collect, summarize, classify, draft, compare, prepare reminders, create non-destructive local archives, or produce a checklist;
- human gate: what the owner must review before execution;
- execution roles: what the operator, AI/skill, scheduler, and platform adapter each do;
- current state: observed, prepared, pending approval, approved, executed, verified, recorded, blocked, ambiguous, cancelled, or data gap;
- output: report, draft, checklist, version diff, action list, or archive note;
- evidence: IDs, links, timestamps, counts, source files, or "data missing";
- success criteria: what must be true for the workflow to be complete;
- stop/question condition: when to stop, ask, or return a structured data gap;
- retry limit: which transient failure may be retried and how many times;
- failure mode: missing source, stale data, ambiguous target, permissions risk, or public-action risk.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 156 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A e3a8bb932213
community-ops-automation-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShiroRyu9/community-ops-kit (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 1,433 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
gws-workflow-email-to-task
Google Workflow: Convert a Gmail message into a Google Tasks entry.
gws-workflow-standup-report
Google Workflow: Today's meetings + open tasks as a standup summary.
n8n-pto-pipeline
Create n8n workflow for daily task assignment from PTO engineer to foreman via Telegram bot with status reporting.
toolbox
Pre/post dev toolbox — named bundles of skills/agents loaded before development work and councils of experts invoked after. Run /toolbox or the toolbox.py CLI to list, activate, initialize, export, import, and validate toolboxes. Invoke at the start or end of a dev session, when setting up a new repo, or when sharing…
lark-workflow-standup-report
A workflow that combines calendar events with unfinished Lark tasks to produce a daily or weekly work summary.
update-scheduled-task
Modify scheduled task settings WITHOUT deleting. Can modify notifyonstart, notifyoncomplete, enabled. Common uses - (1) 'Turn off notification' = notify=false, (2) 'Pause task' = enabled=false, (3) 'Resume task' = enabled=true.