Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/shivaedev/pardes/pr-descriptionnpx skills add ShivaeDev/pardes --skill pr-descriptiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShivaeDev/pardesWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00045 | $0.00368 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00184 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
pr-description scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
pr-description
A good PR description answers three things fast: why does this exist, what did it do, and what should I look at? Use this exact structure, and keep every section short — a reviewer should grasp the change in under a minute.
Title
Meaningful, and about impact — what the change does for the product or system, not how it's implemented. Never a branch name, a file path, or "fix stuff".
Body
Why?
1–3 sentences: the actual problem or motivation. Pull it from the real context; don't invent one. If you genuinely don't know why, find out before opening the PR.
How?
1–2 sentences: a short technical summary for a technical reader — the approach, not a file-by-file walkthrough.
Decisions
One bullet per meaningful tradeoff, abandoned alternative, or scope choice — each with the reason. N/A if there were none.
Callouts
One bullet per spot a reviewer should look harder at — risky surfaces, things that look innocuous but have knock-on effects, one-way doors. Callouts — N/A if everything is straightforward.
Never include
- Files-changed lists — the diff already shows them.
- Test plans or "how I tested" narration.
- Risk speculation and hedging.
- Diff narration — restating the code change in prose.
That's it: an honest title, four short sections, and nothing the diff already says.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 41 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 0b5e323d92a0
pr-description is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShivaeDev/pardes (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 368 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…