Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/shmtulq-cloud/spec-driven-vibe-coding/skillnpx skills add shmtulq-cloud/spec-driven-vibe-coding --skill skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shmtulq-cloud/spec-driven-vibe-codingWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00049 | $0.01342 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00671 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00268 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00134 |
Grade A, and why
spec-driven-vibe-coding scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 129 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spec-Driven Vibe Coding
Use this skill when AI-assisted coding needs to produce maintainable Web/App product work rather than a throwaway demo.
Core idea
Treat AI coding as specification execution, not prompt improvisation. Vibe coding is useful for exploration, taste-making, and rapid option discovery. Production implementation should be spec-bound, testable, and reviewable.
The human role shifts from typing every line to orchestrating and validating: define intent, constrain scope, review architecture, verify correctness, and own what gets merged.
When to use
Use this for product ideas, new features, UX changes, behavior changes, brownfield refactors, bugfixes, prompt changes, agent workflows, structured generation, extraction/classification pipelines, and any work where AI may drift, invent requirements, or produce unreviewable changes.
Keep it lightweight for tiny changes. Still capture outcome, scope, acceptance criteria, implementation notes, and verification.
If the user explicitly asks for a disposable prototype, acknowledge the tradeoff and use only a short intent note plus a verification check.
Hard gates
Do not implement before there is a clear spec or approved design, unless the work is explicitly disposable.
Do not write production code for behavior changes before defining how the behavior will be verified.
Do not silently expand scope. If codebase reality conflicts with the spec, stop and propose a spec update.
Keep specs alive. If implementation changes behavior, constraints, APIs, architecture, or rollout assumptions, update the spec immediately.
Do not claim done, fixed, or passing without fresh evidence.
Coordinator / executor windows
For non-trivial implementation, treat the current conversation as the coordinator by default. The coordinator writes specs, plans, context packets, handoff prompts, audits, and acceptance decisions. It should not directly finish module work unless the task is tiny or the user explicitly asks to implement in this window.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 129 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 4e742acfe14b
spec-driven-vibe-coding is a skill published in the GitHub repository shmtulq-cloud/spec-driven-vibe-coding (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,342 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.