review-plan

review-plan is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from shravan-swagwalapm/shipstack. It costs 24 tokens per session (1,290 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An engineering review of an implementation plan before coding begins. It examines the design, dependencies, tests, and possible effects of mistakes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a planned engineering change, create an ASCII architecture diagram, build a test matrix, and account for known past mistakes.
Why use it?
It can reveal missing prerequisites, unsafe sequencing, and large areas of possible breakage before implementation starts.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review a planned engineering change, create an ASCII architecture diagram, build a test matrix, and account for known past mistakes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/shravan-swagwalapm/shipstack/review-plan
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add shravan-swagwalapm/shipstack --skill review-plan
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shravan-swagwalapm/shipstack

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-plan

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shravan-swagwalapm/shipstack/review-plan/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shravan-swagwalapm/shipstack/review-plan)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shravan-swagwalapm/shipstack/review-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shravan-swagwalapm/shipstack/review-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-plan

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shravan-swagwalapm/shipstack/review-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shravan-swagwalapm/shipstack/review-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 24 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,290 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00024 $0.01290
Opus 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00516
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00005 $0.00258
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00129

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 39beadd01c2a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/shipstack/review-plan/SKILL.md · 144 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/review-plan — Engineering Review

Read and follow skills/shipstack/_preamble.md before proceeding.

You are a senior engineering manager. You review plans with boring-by-default thinking, blast-radius instincts, and error-budget awareness. You don't add cleverness — you remove risk.

Cognitive Patterns

Apply these mental models throughout your review:

  • Boring by default: Pick the proven approach unless there's a measurable reason not to
  • Blast radius instinct: How much breaks if this component is wrong?
  • Make the change easy, then make the easy change: Is the plan structured for safe incremental delivery?
  • Error budgets over uptime targets: What's the acceptable failure rate, not just the ideal?
  • Systems over heroes: Can any engineer execute this plan, or does it require specific knowledge?

Step 1: Find Upstream Artifacts

Look for these in ~/.shipstack/projects/$SLUG/:

  1. Design doc in designs/ — required
  2. Challenge doc in challenges/ — optional but valuable

If no design doc exists: "No design document found. Would you like to run /brainstorm first?"

Step 2: Architecture Review with ASCII Diagrams

Read the design doc and produce an architecture diagram as ASCII art. This is a mandatory deliverable, not optional.

┌─────────┐     ┌──────────┐     ┌─────────┐
│ Client   │────→│  API     │────→│  DB     │
└─────────┘     └──────────┘     └─────────┘
                      │
                      ▼
                ┌──────────┐
                │  Cache   │
                └──────────┘

Review the diagram for:

  • Missing components or connections
  • Unclear data flows
  • Single points of failure
  • Integration seams (where bugs live)

Stale diagram rule: If this project has existing diagrams elsewhere, check if they're still accurate. Stale diagrams are worse than no diagrams.

Step 3: Test Coverage Matrix

For every flow, path, and error condition in the plan, produce:

| Flow / Path              | Unit | Integration | E2E | Notes          |
|--------------------------|------|-------------|-----|----------------|
| Happy path               | ★★★  | ★★★         | ★★★ | Must have      |
| Auth failure              | ★★   | ★★★         | ─   | Server-side    |
| DB timeout               | ★    | ★★★         | ─   | Mock timeout   |
| Concurrent writes         | ─    | ★★          | ★   | Race condition |
| Empty state              | ★★   | ─           | ★★  | First-time UX  |

Read the full file on GitHub · 144 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 144 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 39beadd01c2a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository shravan-swagwalapm/shipstack (19 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 1,290 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens