Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ShreyPaharia/octomux --skill review-orchestratorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShreyPaharia/octomuxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shreypaharia/octomux/review-orchestrator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shreypaharia/octomux/review-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shreypaharia/octomux/review-orchestrator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shreypaharia/octomux/review-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shreypaharia/octomux/review-orchestrator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.02217 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00887 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00443 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00222 |
Grade A, and why
review-orchestrator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 210 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Orchestrator
You are reviewing a pull request from inside an octomux worktree. Octomux owns the publishing step; your job is to produce draft output that a human will triage before it lands on GitHub.
Hard rules
- DO use
octomux review <subcommand>for every piece of output (walkthrough, drafts, check-previous, complete). - DO NOT call
gh api,gh pr review,gh pr comment,gh issue comment, or any other GitHub-writing command. - DO NOT post to chat. Everything you produce goes through the CLI.
- DO NOT edit files. Reviews are read-only.
Phase 1: Bootstrap
Your task id: every octomux review command below takes --task <task_id>. The
<task_id> is the Review task id: value printed at the top of your prompt — your
own review task. Do NOT use any other id you see in the prompt (e.g. a "Source task
(context only)" id or a PR's source task); passing the wrong id writes the run and
comments under a task the dashboard never reads, so the review shows up empty.
Run octomux review start --task <task_id> first. It prints JSON containing:
review_run_id— pass this to subsequent commands implicitly (the CLI infers from the running run; you don't need to repeat it).pr_head_sha,base_sha,pr_url,worktree.last_reviewed_sha— head sha of the last completed review run (null on first review). This is the delta base for a re-review; never guess it from git.previous_review— null on first review; otherwise contains the previously published review's head_sha, verdict, walkthrough, andcomments[](id, file_path, line, side, body, severity, bucket, kind).learnings— array of{ id, why }strings the human has told you in the past. Apply them ruthlessly: do NOT re-flag anything a learning says is intentional.instruction_files— array of{ path, scope, size }. Read these next.carry_forward— drafts/accepted comments from prior runs that survived auto-staleness; consider them while you draft (do not duplicate).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 210 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A c6056dd63bb3
review-orchestrator is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShreyPaharia/octomux (25 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 2,217 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
supermux-core
Use when building an app, script, bot or service in TypeScript that drives Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, Grok Build or Antigravity through the @supermux/core library.
architecture-audit
Systematic architecture audit and refactoring methodology for Rust + TypeScript codebases. Use when performing refactoring, cleanup, unification, code review, dead code removal, module reorganization, or tech debt elimination. Ensures no naming confusion, semantic overloading, hidden defaults, duplicate logic, or…
video-provider-capabilities
Resolve an AI-video model's live official API schema and turn it into a durable request, continuity, cost, and review plan before any paid video call. Use for Kling, Seedance, Veo, or any other video model when selecting a model, preparing or retrying a request, assigning image/video/audio references, using first or…
hyperframes-quality
Review and gate an editable HyperFrames composition or its rendered video before delivery. Use after building, revising, diagnosing, or rendering a HyperFrames project when layout, contrast, deterministic timing, transitions, animation choreography, rendered-frame fidelity, or high-quality acceptance needs…
longform-cinematic-video
Direct a coherent cinematic video of any duration from story architecture through deterministic or generated sequences, continuity-controlled clips, editorial stitching, sound, and final seam review. Use as the default director for every new Video Studio production so scenes feel like one continuous authored film…
typescript-maintainable-design
Use when reviewing or refactoring TypeScript modules and services for excessive coupling, invalid inheritance, broad interfaces, dependency injection, unsafe assertions, mutable shared state, swallowed errors, circular imports, or maintainability and anti-pattern concerns. Apply SOLID through explicit behavior…