Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins --skill wins-duegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins/wins-due)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins/wins-due"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins/wins-due/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins/wins-due"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins/wins-due.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.01173 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00587 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00235 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
wins-due scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 88 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A 52d2e4f86240
wins-due is a skill published in the GitHub repository shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins (7 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 1,173 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-10.
Other skills, from other repositories
reflect
Self-assessment of AI session quality. Scores 5 dimensions from session data and harness memory. Not an agent performance review — it's human self-reflection on how well they used AI assistance. Use when the user says "reflect", "how did I do", "session review", or at the end of a long session.
hold-my-hand
Hold the user's hand through a long multi-step job. Partition the remaining work into phases and present ONLY the current one, never the phases after it beyond a one-line 'Phase 1 of 8' count. Each phase names where to be, numbered steps with exact commands, the expected output, the common failure, who performs each…
name-it-better
Generate and evaluate fresh name candidates for anything: a variable, function, file, module, skill, repo, or domain term. Then let the human pick. Use when the target name is still UNDECIDED, whether the ask is a fresh name ('suggest names', 'what should I call this') or a retry on one just rejected ('name it…
clean-code
Use when the user writes new Python, or asks for review, refactor, or cleanup of Python code, names, comments/docstrings, functions, or tests. Applies Robert Martin's complete Clean Code catalog -- naming, functions, comments, DRY, boundary conditions, and tests -- to the code being changed.
deps-audit
Use when auditing, updating, or securing project dependencies. Covers multi-language dependency detection, security vulnerability scanning, outdated package identification, unused dependency detection, and update strategies for npm, pip, cargo, and go.
git-advanced
Use when performing complex git operations -- rebasing, cherry-picking, resolving merge conflicts, bisecting bugs, managing stashes, cleaning history, or working with monorepos. Goes beyond basic commit/push/pull.