Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ShulkwiSEC/bb-hugenpx agentmods add skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/graphql-idorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/graphql-idor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/graphql-idor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shulkwisec/bb-huge/graphql-idor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.01033 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00517 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
graphql-idor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- graphql-idor — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GraphQL IDOR (BOLA) Exploitation
When to Use
- When auditing modern web applications that utilize GraphQL as their API layer.
- To test the authorization controls on individual objects (nodes) within the graph, ensuring a user cannot access or modify nodes belonging to other users.
Prerequisites
- Authorized scope and target URLs from bug bounty program
- Burp Suite Professional (or Community) configured with browser proxy
- Familiarity with OWASP Top 10 and common web vulnerability classes
- SecLists wordlists for fuzzing and enumeration
Workflow
Phase 1: Identifying the Schema & IDs
# Concept: ```
### Phase 2: Intercepting & Modifying Queries
```graphql
# query getUser {
user(id: "VXNlcjoxNTA=") {
id
email
personalPhone
}
}
# query getUser {
user(id: "VXNlcjoxNTE=") {
id
email
personalPhone
}
}
Phase 3: Exploiting Mutations (State Changes)
# mutation {
updateUserProfile(input: {
userId: "VXNlcjoxNTE=",
email: "[email protected]"
}) {
success
}
}
Phase 4: Batching & Aliases (Bypassing Rate Limits / Automation)
# query {
user1: user(id: "1") { email }
user2: user(id: "2") { email }
user3: user(id: "3") { email }
}
Decision Point 🔀
flowchart TD
A[Identify Node ] --> B{Node ID modified ]}
B -->|Yes| C[Check Response ]
B -->|No| D[Check Context ]
C --> E[Verify Data ]
🔵 Blue Team Detection & Defense
- Object-Level Authorization: Context-Aware Resolvers: Key Concepts | Concept | Description | |---------|-------------|
Output Format
Graphql Idor — Assessment Report
============================================================
Target: [Target identifier]
Assessor: [Operator name]
Date: [Assessment date]
Scope: [Authorized scope]
MITRE ATT&CK: [Relevant technique IDs]
Findings Summary:
[Finding 1]: [Severity] — [Brief description]
[Finding 2]: [Severity] — [Brief description]
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 144 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 6467919384e1
graphql-idor is a skill published in the GitHub repository ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge (22 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 1,033 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
graphql-idor
Identify and exploit Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) or Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) vulnerabilities specifically within GraphQL APIs. This skill focuses on manipulating node IDs, changing variables, and utilizing aliases to access unauthorized data.
testing-api-for-broken-object-level-authorization
Tests REST and GraphQL APIs for Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA/IDOR) vulnerabilities where an authenticated user can access or modify resources belonging to other users by manipulating object identifiers in API requests. The tester intercepts API calls, identifies object ID parameters (numeric IDs, UUIDs…
idor-vulnerability-hunting
Detect and exploit Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerabilities in web applications and APIs. Use this skill when testing for unauthorized access to resources by manipulating object identifiers like user IDs, order numbers, file references, or API endpoints. Covers parameter tampering, UUID prediction, hash…
broken-object-level-authorization
Identify and exploit Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA), historically known as Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR), in API architectures. Extremely common and critical flaw where an API fails to validate whether the currently authenticated user actually owns or retains permissions over the specifically…
graphql-introspection-abuse
Exploit exposed GraphQL introspection endpoints to map the entire API schema. This skill details how to extract available queries, mutations, types, and fields, which significantly aids in identifying hidden endpoints, Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA/IDOR), and mass assignment vulnerabilities.
testing-api-for-broken-object-level-authorization
Tests REST and GraphQL APIs for Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA/IDOR) vulnerabilities where an authenticated user can access or modify resources belonging to other users by manipulating object identifiers in API requests. The tester intercepts API calls, identifies object ID parameters (numeric IDs, UUIDs…