Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add shyftlabs/continuum --skill continuum-evaluationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shyftlabs/continuumWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/shyftlabs/continuum/continuum-evaluation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shyftlabs/continuum/continuum-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shyftlabs/continuum/continuum-evaluation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/shyftlabs/continuum/continuum-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/shyftlabs/continuum/continuum-evaluation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.01272 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00509 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00254 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00127 |
Grade A, and why
continuum-evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 183 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Continuum Evaluation Skill
Continuum ships an evaluation framework under continuum.evaluation.
It's an optional extra — install with:
pip install "shyftlabs-continuum[eval]"
# adds: deepeval >= 1.0.0, ragas >= 0.2.0
Authoritative source: src/continuum/evaluation/ in this
repository. There is no dedicated user-facing doc; this skill is the
primary reference.
Imports
from continuum.evaluation import (
EvaluatorAgent, # specialised agent that scores other agents
DeepEvalEvaluator, # DeepEval criterion-based evaluation
RagasEvaluator, # RAGAS metrics for RAG pipelines
LangfuseDatasetClient, # pull/push datasets from Langfuse
EvalCase, EvalResult, EvalStatus, CriterionScore,
)
EvaluatorAgent
A specialised BaseAgent that takes another agent's output (plus
optional reference) and produces a structured score.
from continuum.agent import BaseAgent, AgentRunner
from continuum.evaluation import EvaluatorAgent
target_agent = BaseAgent(name="target", instructions="Answer concisely.")
evaluator = EvaluatorAgent(
name="quality-judge",
criteria=[
"Factual accuracy (0-1)",
"Conciseness (0-1)",
"Helpfulness (0-1)",
],
model="gpt-4o-mini",
)
# Evaluate one trace
target_resp = await AgentRunner().run(target_agent, "What is the capital of France?")
score = await evaluator.evaluate(
input="What is the capital of France?",
output=target_resp.content,
reference="Paris is the capital of France.",
)
print(score) # {"factual_accuracy": 1.0, "conciseness": 0.9, "helpfulness": 0.8}
DeepEval
Use for criterion-based per-case scoring; great for unit-test-style agent regression suites.
from continuum.evaluation import DeepEvalEvaluator
from deepeval.metrics import AnswerRelevancyMetric, FaithfulnessMetric
evaluator = DeepEvalEvaluator(
metrics=[
AnswerRelevancyMetric(threshold=0.7),
FaithfulnessMetric(threshold=0.8),
],
)
results = await evaluator.evaluate_batch([
{"input": "...", "output": "...", "expected_output": "...", "context": ["..."]},
# …
])
for r in results:
print(r.metric_name, r.score, r.success, r.reason)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 183 lines · 68 tokens per session scan A 8c2a54f4f0e6
continuum-evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository shyftlabs/continuum (84 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 1,272 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
screen-reader-testing
Test web applications with screen readers including VoiceOver, NVDA, and JAWS. Use when validating screen reader compatibility, debugging accessibility issues, or ensuring assistive technology support.
temporal-python-testing
Test Temporal workflows with pytest, time-skipping, and mocking strategies. Covers unit testing, integration testing, replay testing, and local development setup. Use when implementing Temporal workflow tests or debugging test failures.
verify-dotnet-samples
How to build, run and verify the .NET sample projects in the Agent Framework repository. Use this when a user wants to verify that the samples still function as expected.
tdd
Use only when the user explicitly asks for TDD, a failing test, or a regression test, OR when the bug has an obvious cheap local test target. Skip when the test path is unclear, expensive, integration-heavy, or not requested.
verification-strategy
Thorough verification of completed work before declaring done.
test-generator
Generate pytest test cases for Python functions and classes.