Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sienklogic/plan-build-run/debugnpx skills add SienkLogic/plan-build-run --skill debuggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SienkLogic/plan-build-runWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sienklogic/plan-build-run/debug)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sienklogic/plan-build-run/debug"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sienklogic/plan-build-run/debug.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.04728 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.02364 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00946 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00473 |
Grade A, and why
debug scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 580 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
STOP — DO NOT READ THIS FILE. You are already reading it. This prompt was injected into your context by Claude Code's plugin system. Using the Read tool on this SKILL.md file wastes ~7,600 tokens. Begin executing Step 1 immediately.
Step 0 — Immediate Output
Before ANY tool calls, display this banner:
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ PLAN-BUILD-RUN ► DEBUGGING ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Then proceed to Step 1.
/pbr:debug — Systematic Debugging
You are running the debug skill. Your job is to run a structured, hypothesis-driven debugging session that persists across conversations. You track every hypothesis, test, and finding in a debug file so work is never lost.
This skill spawns Task(subagent_type: "pbr:debugger") for investigation work.
References
references/questioning.md— Investigation questioning patterns: progressive depth, exploratory questions, concrete options (not open-ended)references/ui-brand.md— Status symbols, banners, error boxes for issue reporting
Context Budget
Reference: skills/shared/context-budget.md for the universal orchestrator rules.
Reference: skills/shared/agent-type-resolution.md for agent type fallback when spawning Task() subagents.
Additionally for this skill:
- Never perform investigation work yourself — delegate ALL analysis to the debugger subagent
- Minimize reading debug file content — read only the latest hypothesis and result section
- Delegate all code reading, hypothesis testing, and fix attempts to the debugger subagent
Core Principle
Debug systematically, not randomly. Every investigation step must have a hypothesis, a test, and a recorded result. No "let me just try this" — every action has a reason and is documented.
Flow
Step 1: Ensure Debug Directory Exists
CRITICAL (no hook) -- DO NOT SKIP: Create debug directory before any file writes.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 580 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 3b17d822e3ee
debug is a skill published in the GitHub repository SienkLogic/plan-build-run (17 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 4,728 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
doncheli-api-contract
Design complete API contracts covering endpoints, auth, rate limiting, error handling, retries, circuit breaker and idempotency. Activate when user mentions "api contract", "api design", "endpoint", "webhook", "REST", "GraphQL", "OpenAPI", "design the API".
doncheli-reasoning
Apply structured reasoning models to analyze a decision or problem. Activate when user mentions "reason", "pre-mortem", "5 whys", "pareto", "think through", "analyze decision", "inversion", "first principles", "second order".
doncheli-debate
Run an adversarial multi-role debate to surface trade-offs and reach a reasoned decision. Activate when user mentions "debate", "discuss", "trade-off", "decision", "compare options", "pros and cons", "choose between".
doncheli-migrate
Plan and execute technology migrations with wave planning, breaking change detection and task generation. Activate when user mentions "migrate", "migration", "upgrade", "move from", "switch to", "Vue to React", "JS to TS", "v1 to v2".
doncheli-spec-score
Evaluate the quality of a spec and return a structured score with improvement recommendations. Activate when user mentions "spec quality", "score spec", "how good is my spec", "spec review", "validate spec quality".
doncheli-tech-panel
Convene a senior engineering expert panel to evaluate technical decisions. Activate when user mentions "tech panel", "technical discussion", "expert opinion", "architecture decision", "which technology", "should we use".