Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add SienkLogic/plan-build-run --skill list-phase-assumptionsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SienkLogic/plan-build-runWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sienklogic/plan-build-run/list-phase-assumptions)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sienklogic/plan-build-run/list-phase-assumptions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sienklogic/plan-build-run/list-phase-assumptions/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sienklogic/plan-build-run/list-phase-assumptions"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sienklogic/plan-build-run/list-phase-assumptions.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.01791 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00896 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00358 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
list-phase-assumptions scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 232 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
STOP -- DO NOT READ THIS FILE. You are already reading it. This prompt was injected into your context by Claude Code's plugin system. Using the Read tool on this SKILL.md file wastes tokens. Begin executing Step 0 immediately.
Step 0 -- Immediate Output
Before ANY tool calls, display this banner:
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ PLAN-BUILD-RUN ► ASSUMPTIONS ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Then proceed to Step 1.
/pbr:list-phase-assumptions -- Surface Assumptions Before Planning
References: @references/ui-brand.md
You are running the list-phase-assumptions skill. Your job is to surface Claude's assumptions about a phase BEFORE planning begins. This helps users catch misconceptions early, before they propagate into plans and code.
Key difference from /pbr:discuss: This skill is ANALYSIS of what Claude thinks, not INTAKE of what the user knows. No file output -- purely conversational to prompt discussion.
This skill runs inline (no Task delegation).
Step 1 -- Parse Arguments
Extract the phase number from $ARGUMENTS.
If argument missing:
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ ERROR ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Phase number required.
Usage: /pbr:list-phase-assumptions <phase-number>
Example: /pbr:list-phase-assumptions 3
Exit the skill.
If argument provided:
Validate the phase exists in .planning/ROADMAP.md:
grep -i "Phase ${PHASE}" .planning/ROADMAP.md
If phase not found:
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ ERROR ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Phase {N} not found in roadmap.
Available phases:
{list phases from ROADMAP.md}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 232 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 024cae74991e
list-phase-assumptions is a skill published in the GitHub repository SienkLogic/plan-build-run (17 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 1,791 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
self-assessment
Interactive skill assessment with personalized learning path generation.
investigate
Systematic root-cause debugging: find the cause before writing any fix.
release-notes-generator
Generate release notes in 3 formats (CHANGELOG.md, PR body, Slack announcement) from git commits. Automatically categorizes changes and converts technical language to user-friendly messaging. Use for releases, changelogs, version notes, what's new summaries, or ship announcements.
talk-stage4-position
Generates 3-4 strategic talk angles with strength/weakness analysis, title options, CFP descriptions, and a peer feedback draft, then enforces a mandatory CHECKPOINT for user confirmation before scripting. Use when deciding how to frame a talk, preparing a CFP submission, or choosing between multiple narrative angles.
learn-alternatives
Compare different approaches to solve the same problem.
talk-stage3-concepts
Builds a numbered, categorized concept catalogue from the talk summary and timeline, scoring each concept HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW for talk potential with optional repo enrichment. Use when you need a structured inventory of concepts before choosing a talk angle, or when assessing which ideas have the strongest…