Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sienklogic/plan-build-run/plannpx skills add SienkLogic/plan-build-run --skill plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SienkLogic/plan-build-runWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sienklogic/plan-build-run/plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sienklogic/plan-build-run/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sienklogic/plan-build-run/plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00019 | $0.12093 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.06046 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.02419 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.01209 |
Grade A, and why
plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 965 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
STOP — DO NOT READ THIS FILE. You are already reading it. This prompt was injected into your context by Claude Code's plugin system. Using the Read tool on this SKILL.md file wastes ~7,600 tokens. Begin executing Step 1 immediately.
/pbr:plan-phase — Phase Planning
References: @references/questioning.md, @references/ui-brand.md
You are the orchestrator for /pbr:plan-phase. This skill creates detailed, executable plans for a specific phase. Plans are the bridge between the roadmap and actual code — they must be specific enough for an executor agent to follow mechanically. Your job is to stay lean, delegate heavy work to Task() subagents, and keep the user's main context window clean.
Context Budget
Reference: skills/shared/context-budget.md for the universal orchestrator rules.
Reference: skills/shared/agent-type-resolution.md for agent type fallback when spawning Task() subagents.
Additionally for this skill:
- Minimize reading subagent output — read only plan frontmatter for summaries. Exception: if
context_window_tokensin.planning/config.jsonis >= 500000, reading full plan bodies is permitted when content is needed for inline decisions. - Delegate all research and planning work to subagents — the orchestrator routes, it doesn't plan
Step 0 — Immediate Output
Before ANY tool calls, display this banner:
╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
║ PLAN-BUILD-RUN ► PLANNING PHASE {N} ║
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
Where {N} is the phase number from $ARGUMENTS. Then proceed to Step 1.
Multi-Session Sync
Before any phase-modifying operations (writing PLAN files, updating STATE.md/ROADMAP.md), acquire a claim:
acquireClaim(phaseDir, sessionId)
If the claim fails (another session owns this phase), display: "Another session owns this phase. Use /pbr:progress to see active claims."
On completion or error (including all exit paths), release the claim:
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 965 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 92cd5fd80c75
plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository SienkLogic/plan-build-run (17 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 12,093 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
doncheli-prd
Generate professional Product Requirement Documents (PRD) from multiple sources — Figma designs, briefs, user research, existing code. Includes risk analysis, RICE prioritization, Gherkin stories and launch plan. Activate when user mentions "PRD", "product requirements", "requirement document", "product spec", "figma…
doncheli-api-contract
Design complete API contracts covering endpoints, auth, rate limiting, error handling, retries, circuit breaker and idempotency. Activate when user mentions "api contract", "api design", "endpoint", "webhook", "REST", "GraphQL", "OpenAPI", "design the API".
doncheli-reasoning
Apply structured reasoning models to analyze a decision or problem. Activate when user mentions "reason", "pre-mortem", "5 whys", "pareto", "think through", "analyze decision", "inversion", "first principles", "second order".
doncheli-debate
Run an adversarial multi-role debate to surface trade-offs and reach a reasoned decision. Activate when user mentions "debate", "discuss", "trade-off", "decision", "compare options", "pros and cons", "choose between".
doncheli-tech-panel
Convene a senior engineering expert panel to evaluate technical decisions. Activate when user mentions "tech panel", "technical discussion", "expert opinion", "architecture decision", "which technology", "should we use".
doncheli-audit-trail
Record and query the decision log for a project. Activate when user mentions "audit", "trail", "log decisions", "decision history", "why was this decided", "ADR", "architecture decision".