Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/agent-evalnpx skills add sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc --skill agent-evalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sifxprime/kodelyth-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/agent-eval)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/agent-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/agent-eval.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00037 | $0.01085 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00543 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00217 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
agent-eval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to agent-eval — 27 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Eval Skill
A lightweight CLI tool for comparing coding agents head-to-head on reproducible tasks. Every "which coding agent is best?" comparison runs on vibes — this tool systematizes it.
When to Activate
- Comparing coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on your own codebase
- Measuring agent performance before adopting a new tool or model
- Running regression checks when an agent updates its model or tooling
- Producing data-backed agent selection decisions for a team
Installation
Note: Install agent-eval from its repository after reviewing the source.
Core Concepts
YAML Task Definitions
Define tasks declaratively. Each task specifies what to do, which files to touch, and how to judge success:
name: add-retry-logic
description: Add exponential backoff retry to the HTTP client
repo: ./my-project
files:
- src/http_client.py
prompt: |
Add retry logic with exponential backoff to all HTTP requests.
Max 3 retries. Initial delay 1s, max delay 30s.
judge:
- type: pytest
command: pytest tests/test_http_client.py -v
- type: grep
pattern: "exponential_backoff|retry"
files: src/http_client.py
commit: "abc1234" # pin to specific commit for reproducibility
Git Worktree Isolation
Each agent run gets its own git worktree — no Docker required. This provides reproducibility isolation so agents cannot interfere with each other or corrupt the base repo.
Metrics Collected
| Metric | What It Measures |
|---|---|
| Pass rate | Did the agent produce code that passes the judge? |
| Cost | API spend per task (when available) |
| Time | Wall-clock seconds to completion |
| Consistency | Pass rate across repeated runs (e.g., 3/3 = 100%) |
Workflow
1. Define Tasks
Create a tasks/ directory with YAML files, one per task:
mkdir tasks
# Write task definitions (see template above)
2. Run Agents
Execute agents against your tasks:
agent-eval run --task tasks/add-retry-logic.yaml --agent claude-code --agent aider --runs 3
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 146 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 200179d515f9
agent-eval is a skill published in the GitHub repository sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc (11 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,085 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to agent-eval, differing in 27 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
foolproof-product
Use this skill on ANY code change in codevira's product surface (mcpserver/, indexer/). Triggers on Edit/Write to product code, on phrases like "fix bug", "add feature", "handle error", or any modification to commands the end-user runs. Enforces 10 product- reliability principles: no silent failures, atomic state…
epistemic-honesty
Use this skill whenever you're about to (1) make a definitive claim like "this works", "tests pass", "ready to ship", "fixed", "done"; or (2) propose a solution to a problem; or (3) diagnose a bug or issue. Forces explicit confidence calibration with inline evidence, surfaces what you don't know, and demands a…
open-source-quality
Use this skill before committing, pushing, or opening a PR. Triggers on phrases like "commit", "git commit", "push", "open PR", "create pull request", "finalize this change". Enforces conventional commit messages, atomic commits, code style (ruff/mypy), public-API docstrings, actionable error messages, changelog…
release-readiness
Use this skill whenever the conversation mentions releasing, shipping, publishing, promoting to PyPI, "ship it", "release X.Y.Z", "ready to release", "let's publish", or any phrase suggesting moving codevira to production. Walks the 5-gate release gauntlet (G1-G5) and refuses to proceed without evidence at every gate.…
development-discipline
Use this skill before ANY code-writing tool call (Edit, Write, NotebookEdit) on this project. Triggers on phrases like "implement", "fix bug", "add feature", "refactor", "create function", "modify file", or whenever the user asks for a code change. Forces a 4-step CONTEXT → PURPOSE → REASON → CODE sequence with…
practical-coding
Use for implementing, fixing, refactoring, or reviewing code with the smallest correct change; routes only unresolved debugging, architecture/choice, or risk-boundary blockers, while code retrieval uses the cheapest sufficient available capability.