Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc --skill agent-sortgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sifxprime/kodelyth-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/agent-sort)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/agent-sort"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/agent-sort/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/agent-sort"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc/agent-sort.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.01408 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00563 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00282 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00141 |
Grade A, and why
agent-sort scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to agent-sort — 13 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 223 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Sort
Use this skill when a repo needs a project-specific ECC surface instead of the default full install.
The goal is not to guess what "feels useful." The goal is to classify ECC components with evidence from the actual codebase.
When to Use
- A project only needs a subset of ECC and full installs are too noisy
- The repo stack is clear, but nobody wants to hand-curate skills one by one
- A team wants a repeatable install decision backed by grep evidence instead of opinion
- You need to separate always-loaded daily workflow surfaces from searchable library/reference surfaces
- A repo has drifted into the wrong language, rule, or hook set and needs cleanup
Non-Negotiable Rules
- Use the current repository as the source of truth, not generic preferences
- Every DAILY decision must cite concrete repo evidence
- LIBRARY does not mean "delete"; it means "keep accessible without loading by default"
- Do not install hooks, rules, or scripts that the current repo cannot use
- Prefer ECC-native surfaces; do not introduce a second install system
Outputs
Produce these artifacts in order:
- DAILY inventory
- LIBRARY inventory
- install plan
- verification report
- optional
skill-libraryrouter if the project wants one
Classification Model
Use two buckets only:
DAILY- should load every session for this repo
- strongly matched to the repo's language, framework, workflow, or operator surface
LIBRARY- useful to retain, but not worth loading by default
- should remain reachable through search, router skill, or selective manual use
Evidence Sources
Use repo-local evidence before making any classification:
- file extensions
- package managers and lockfiles
- framework configs
- CI and hook configs
- build/test scripts
- imports and dependency manifests
- repo docs that explicitly describe the stack
Useful commands include:
# ripgrep is not preinstalled anywhere; fall back to find/grep when absent.
if command -v rg >/dev/null; then
rg --files
rg -n "typescript|react|next|supabase|django|spring|flutter|swift"
else
find . -type f -not -path '*/node_modules/*' -not -path '*/.git/*'
grep -rEn "typescript|react|next|supabase|django|spring|flutter|swift" . \
--exclude-dir=node_modules --exclude-dir=.git
fi
cat package.json
cat pyproject.toml
cat Cargo.toml
cat pubspec.yaml
cat go.mod
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +7 lines 53b1f8b7d3e7
- 1mo ago First seen · 216 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A 51d5b461ebd9
agent-sort is a skill published in the GitHub repository sifxprime/kodelyth-ecc (11 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 1,408 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to agent-sort, differing in 13 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
practical-coding
Use for implementing, fixing, refactoring, or reviewing code with the smallest correct change; routes only unresolved debugging, architecture/choice, or risk-boundary blockers, while code retrieval uses the cheapest sufficient available capability.
architecture-decision-records
Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.
peon-ping-log
Log exercise reps for the Peon Trainer. Use when user says they did pushups, squats, or wants to log reps. Examples - "/peon-ping-log 25 pushups", "/peon-ping-log 30 squats", "log 50 pushups".
deployment-engineer
Expert deployment engineer specializing in modern CI/CD pipelines, GitOps workflows, and advanced deployment automation. Masters GitHub Actions, ArgoCD/Flux, progressive delivery, container security, and platform engineering. Handles zero-downtime deployments, security scanning, and developer experience optimization.…
observability-monitoring-slo-implement
You are an SLO (Service Level Objective) expert specializing in implementing reliability standards and error budget-based practices. Design SLO frameworks, define SLIs, and build monitoring that balances reliability with delivery velocity.
apiverve-automation
Automate Apiverve tasks via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.