Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sighthesia/interactive-choice-mcp/webapp-testingnpx skills add Sighthesia/interactive-choice-mcp --skill webapp-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Sighthesia/interactive-choice-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sighthesia/interactive-choice-mcp/webapp-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sighthesia/interactive-choice-mcp/webapp-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sighthesia/interactive-choice-mcp/webapp-testing.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00884 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00442 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00177 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
webapp-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 96 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 51b7349e77ec
webapp-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository Sighthesia/interactive-choice-mcp (4 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 884 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
webqa
Use WebQA to test websites, web pages, URLs, login flows, search flows, forms, navigation, and core user journeys with an AI browser QA agent.
penguin-harness-manual-test
Use when standing PenguinHarness up to try a change by hand — launching the Web App, the desktop shell, the landing page or the docs site to click through it, screenshot it, or reproduce a report. Covers the four dev entry points and their ports, which data root each writes to, and the four ways a healthy setup looks…
mirroir-onboard
Onboard a consumer web app to mirroir's .mirroir/ dotfile by EXPLORING the running app (chrome-devtools-mcp) — derive real selectors from the accessibility tree, exercise each surface's primary action, emit the .mirroir/ tree, and validate by LIVE REPLAY with a self-heal loop. Reject shallow "page renders" coverage.
e2e-verify
面向 Bifrost 管理端的端到端 UI 与 API 验证工具。 适用于浏览器测试、场景回归、管理端接口验证与页面快照排查。 Use when: 端到端验证、功能验证、E2E 测试、UI 测试、浏览器测试、API 测试、接口验证.
shaft-assertions
Use when selecting or repairing SHAFT hard assertions, soft verifications, browser or element oracles, API checks, object checks, or failure messages.
shaft-recording-codegen
Use when a persisted SHAFT web, Playwright, mobile, or API recording must become compilable, repository-aware Java code or insertion blocks.