Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sighup/claude-workflow --skill cw-gherkingit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sighup/claude-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sighup/claude-workflow/cw-gherkin)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sighup/claude-workflow/cw-gherkin"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sighup/claude-workflow/cw-gherkin/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sighup/claude-workflow/cw-gherkin"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sighup/claude-workflow/cw-gherkin.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.02641 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.01321 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00528 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00264 |
Grade A, and why
cw-gherkin scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/README.md 1.5 KB
- assets/template-api.md 2.0 KB
- assets/template-async.md 2.1 KB
- assets/template-cli-process.md 1.9 KB
- assets/template-error-handling.md 2.7 KB
- assets/template-state.md 2.6 KB
- assets/template-web-ui.md 1.8 KB
- references/behavioral-vs-structural.md 4.8 KB
- references/integration-test-requirements.md 3.7 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 247 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 97e38e4e402e
cw-gherkin is a skill published in the GitHub repository sighup/claude-workflow (15 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 2,641 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
implementation-standards
Reference material with coding standards (defensive coding, error handling, testing patterns). Loaded on demand by the Developer sub-agent (.github/agents/developer.md); not directly invokable.
clarification-strategies
Reference material with ambiguity-audit patterns and critique strategies for requirements. Loaded on demand by clarify-spec; not directly invokable.
gauntlet-proof-audit
Use to audit the gauntlet records, "are the ROUNDS.md records honest", "verify the proof corpus", "check each run record against its evidence", "audit the gauntlet corpus", "is the gauntlet proof trustworthy", or a scheduled gauntlet-proof-audit cadence run. Enumerates every committed gauntlet run record…
ai-feature-eval-harness
Design an evaluation plan for a product AI feature (LLM- or model-backed output): measurable success criteria, a held-out labeled eval dataset shape, per-criterion grading (code-based first, then LLM-based for nuanced judgment), and a pass threshold, then persist as AIEVALPLAN.md. Use when the task ships or changes a…
systematic-debugging
Use when a defect, test failure, flaky test, or unexpected behavior needs its cause established before anyone writes a task file or a fix. Reproduces the report first, localizes the failure to the boundary where behavior diverges, then tests one hypothesis at a time and returns a deterministic verdict, so a run that…
verifier-agent
Use before reconciling or landing an implementation to independently verify it against its approved spec and its task's acceptance criteria. Runs the declared verification commands and records each exact outcome, composes the spec-conformance lens so a contract divergence fails the run even when every command passes…