cw-review-team

cw-review-team is a skill for Claude Code from sighup/claude-workflow. It costs 54 tokens per session (4,430 once invoked), scanned A, original, no licence file.

A team-based code-review tool in which reviewers inspect all files through separate lenses, including security, correctness, and compliance with the specification.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing code after validation for security issues, correctness problems, and mismatches with the specification; it requires `CLAUDECODETASKLISTID`.
Why use it?
It spreads review concerns across specialized checks while keeping every reviewer aware of the full change. It is intended for a more thorough pass before merging.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Part of the claude-workflow plugin — 13 skills, 1 hook shipped together

Good fit Reviewing code after validation for security issues, correctness problems, and mismatches with the specification; it requires CLAUDECODETASKLISTID.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/sighup/claude-workflow/cw-review-team
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add sighup/claude-workflow --skill cw-review-team
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sighup/claude-workflow

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install claude-workflow, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 13 skills, 1 hook.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for cw-review-team

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sighup/claude-workflow/cw-review-team/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sighup/claude-workflow/cw-review-team)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sighup/claude-workflow/cw-review-team"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sighup/claude-workflow/cw-review-team/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for cw-review-team

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sighup/claude-workflow/cw-review-team"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sighup/claude-workflow/cw-review-team.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 54 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,430 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00054 $0.04430
Opus 5 $0.00027 $0.02215
Sonnet 5 $0.00011 $0.00886
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00443

Measured 10d ago against content hash 70b720d4cfbc, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cw-review-team scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugin/skills/cw-review-team/SKILL.md · 501 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 501 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 70b720d4cfbc

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cw-review-team is a skill published in the GitHub repository sighup/claude-workflow (15 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 4,430 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

backlog-reconcile

Use when auditing, reconciling, or verifying a repo's meta/BACKLOG.md Active queue against reality, "audit the backlog", "reconcile the board", "is the board still true", "dọn backlog", "rà soát backlog", "check board rows against their specs", or when a scheduled run asks for the backlog-reconcile audit of a repo.…

dwarvesf/dwarves-kit · 155 tokens

doc-drift

Use for the whole-estate doc audit, "run the doc-drift loop", "audit the docs against the code", "are the docs still true", "doc drift sweep", "check every doc claim", or a scheduled doc-audit cadence run. Enumerates every LIVING doc (README, MANUAL, AGENTS, WORKFLOW, architecture, patterns), verdicts each against the…

dwarvesf/dwarves-kit · 163 tokens

gauntlet-proof-audit

Use to audit the gauntlet records, "are the ROUNDS.md records honest", "verify the proof corpus", "check each run record against its evidence", "audit the gauntlet corpus", "is the gauntlet proof trustworthy", or a scheduled gauntlet-proof-audit cadence run. Enumerates every committed gauntlet run record…

dwarvesf/dwarves-kit · 177 tokens

memory-tidy

Use when auditing, consolidating, or cleaning a repo's .claude/memory store, "dọn memory", "memory tidy", the biweekly memory audit, duplicate or stale memory notes, MEMORY.md index drift (notes missing from the index, index entries with no file), or when a scheduled run asks for the memory-tidy audit of a repository.…

dwarvesf/dwarves-kit · 113 tokens

repo-consistency-sweep

Proactive defect-class detection that handles the lower-value half of code review (per Bacchelli and Bird 2013) so human reviewers stay focused on design, intent, and knowledge transfer. Catches convention drift, ordering bugs, type-safety gaps, security and multi-tenant invariants (CWE-grounded), and operability…

Mozurok/fhorja.dev · 200 tokens

pr-feedback-ingest

Turn PR feedback (Greptile, CI, bots, humans) into a structured traceable backlog aligned with TASKSTATE.md, DECISIONS.md, and IMPLEMENTATIONPLAN.md so the next execution step can be a narrow implement-approved-slice or a small planning touch without losing alignment. Corrective scope only. Use when a PR is open or…

Mozurok/fhorja.dev · 230 tokens