Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sigistry/marketplace/error-envelopenpx skills add sigistry/marketplace --skill error-envelopegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sigistry/marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sigistry/marketplace/error-envelope)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sigistry/marketplace/error-envelope"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sigistry/marketplace/error-envelope.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00099 | $0.01002 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.00501 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00200 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
error-envelope scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 43 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Error Envelope
Purpose
Provide one standardized way to (1) validate a request at the boundary and (2) return every error in a consistent, machine-readable envelope. These are high-volume boilerplate that teams re-implement inconsistently, one endpoint returns { "error": "bad" }, the next returns a 200 with { "success": false }, a third leaks a stack trace. The cure is a single validation layer plus a single error format: RFC 9457 Problem Details (application/problem+json), which obsoletes RFC 7807 (same wire format, updated reference).
The RFC 9457 envelope
Every error response is application/problem+json with these standard members (all optional, but be consistent):
| Member | Meaning |
|---|---|
type |
A URI identifying the problem kind (dereferenceable docs, or about:blank). The primary identifier. |
title |
Short, human-readable, stable summary for that type. |
status |
The HTTP status code, duplicated in the body. |
detail |
Human-readable explanation specific to this occurrence. |
instance |
A URI for this specific occurrence (e.g. the request path or an error id). |
Add extension members for machine use: errors (per-field validation failures), traceId/requestId, code (your internal error code), retryAfter. See references/rfc9457.md.
Validation → error, at the boundary
Validate params, query, and body before business logic. A validator failure is not an exception to leak, map it into the envelope with a 422 Unprocessable Content (or 400) and an errors array of { field, message, code }. See references/validation-patterns.md for the idiomatic validator per stack (Zod, Pydantic, class-validator, Joi, JSON Schema/Ajv, Go validator, Rails strong params) and how to reshape each library's native error into the envelope.
Golden rules
- One error handler. Centralize the envelope in middleware / an exception filter /
@ControllerAdvice/ DRFexception_handler: never hand-format errors per route. - Status in the status line and the body. They must match.
- Never 200-with-error. An error is a 4xx/5xx; a
200 { success: false }breaks every generic client and HTTP cache. - Reject unknown fields in strict endpoints (
.strict(),forbid_extra,additionalProperties: false) so typos and injected fields fail loudly. - Never leak internals. No stack traces, SQL, file paths, or ORM messages in
detail; log those server-side and put atraceIdin the body instead. - Stable
typeURIs. Clients branch ontype, not on the prose intitle/detail: keeptypestable even when you reword the message. - Content negotiation. Set
Content-Type: application/problem+jsonso clients can distinguish a problem from a normal body.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 43 lines · 99 tokens per session scan A cfe02c34ebd1
error-envelope is a skill published in the GitHub repository sigistry/marketplace (3 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 1,002 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
design-everyday-things
Apply foundational design principles: affordances, signifiers, constraints, feedback, and conceptual models. Use when the user mentions "why is this confusing", "affordance", "error prevention", "discoverability", "human-centered design", "mental model", "mapping", "seven stages of action", "users keep making…
create-app
Guided journey from a raw app idea to a validated, cleanly architected first version that ships on a sustainable cadence. Orchestrates ten skills phase by phase - lean-startup, design-sprint, clean-architecture, domain-driven-design, clean-code, pragmatic-programmer, system-design, ios-hig-design, 37signals-way…
cold-start-problem
Start and scale networked products using Andrew Chen's "The Cold Start Problem" framework for network effects. Use when the user mentions "network effects", "chicken and egg", "cold start", "two-sided marketplace", "atomic network", "hard side", "liquidity", "critical mass", "invite-only launch", "how do I get my…
release-it
Build production-ready systems with stability patterns: circuit breakers, bulkheads, timeouts, and retry logic. Use when the user mentions "production outage", "circuit breaker", "deployment pipeline", "chaos engineering", "retry storm", "health checks", "my service keeps crashing", "prevent cascading failures", or…
37signals-way
Build lean, opinionated products using the 37signals philosophy from "Getting Real", "Rework", and "Shape Up". Use when the user mentions "Getting Real", "Rework", "Shape Up", "37signals", "Basecamp method", "six-week cycles", "fixed time variable scope", "appetite vs estimates", "betting table", "breadboarding", "fat…
root-cause-investigator
Systematic root cause analysis for errors, bugs, and unexpected behaviors using 5-Why methodology. Use when user reports errors, build failures, test failures, performance issues, integration problems, or any "it's not working" scenarios.