Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sillsdev/fieldworks/sil-library-reusenpx skills add sillsdev/FieldWorks --skill sil-library-reusegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sillsdev/FieldWorksWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sillsdev/fieldworks/sil-library-reuse)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sillsdev/fieldworks/sil-library-reuse"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sillsdev/fieldworks/sil-library-reuse.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00150 | $0.03656 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00075 | $0.01828 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00731 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00366 |
Grade A, and why
sil-library-reuse scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 349 lines · 150 tokens per session scan A bbe9c3e5d7b8
sil-library-reuse is a skill published in the GitHub repository sillsdev/FieldWorks (111 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 150 tokens to every session and 3,656 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
zhtw-verify
How a zhtw-mcp change is validated - make check as the gate, the generated tables and the ruleset normalization that have to be current before it passes, the formatter chain in scripts/indent.sh, the git hooks and their own suite, the corpus thresholds a new rule has to clear, and the lanes that need a network or a…
zhtw-conventions
The zhtw-mcp conventions no gate enforces - the register a comment, a commit message and a PR reply are written in, where Chinese belongs in the tree and where it does not, the untracked working docs at the repo root, deleting a redundant surface instead of deprecating it, and the repository layout. Use when drafting…
zhtw-rules
What the gates cannot tell you about adding or changing a zh-TW rule - why assets/ruleset.json is the only place a vocabulary rule lives, the false-friend problem and the four gates that answer it, the corpus thresholds a rule has to clear, why positions are byte offsets through NFC, and how a rule reaches the…
zh-article-analyzer
繁體中文文章深度分析技能。對任何中文文章進行多維度科學化剖析，產出精確到行號與段落的分析報告。 涵蓋：文體指紋（Stylometrics）、語言節奏、詞彙豐富度、引用與典故圖譜、主題動態、情感弧線、 修辭力道、文白比、成語密度等。結合 Python 量化腳本與 LLM 質性分析，產出完整的「文章指紋報告」。 當使用者提到「分析文章」、「文章風格」、「寫作分析」、「文體分析」、「文章指紋」、「語言風格」、 「修辭分析」、「文章比較」、「作者風格」、「寫法分析」，或上傳中文文章要求任何形式的語言學或 文體學分析時，務必觸發此技能。即使使用者只是問「這篇文章寫得怎樣」也應觸發。.
argument-mapping
Use this Skill to extract and visualize argument structure: Toulmin reconstruction, support/attack graph, circularity detection, argument scheme classification, and NLP-based premise extraction.
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.