Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sillyDaibo/reasflow-devnpx agentmods add skills/sillydaibo/reasflow-dev/algorithm-design-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sillydaibo/reasflow-dev/algorithm-design-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sillydaibo/reasflow-dev/algorithm-design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sillydaibo/reasflow-dev/algorithm-design-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sillydaibo/reasflow-dev/algorithm-design-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sillydaibo/reasflow-dev/algorithm-design-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00281 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00112 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
algorithm-design-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Installed Root
Resolve the installed reasflow-dev skills root before running packaged scripts:
REASFLOW_SKILLS_ROOT="${REASFLOW_SKILLS_ROOT:-}"
if [ -z "$REASFLOW_SKILLS_ROOT" ]; then
if [ -d ./.agents/skills ]; then
REASFLOW_SKILLS_ROOT="$(pwd)/.agents/skills"
elif [ -d "$HOME/.agents/skills" ]; then
REASFLOW_SKILLS_ROOT="$HOME/.agents/skills"
else
echo "reasflow-dev skills not found in ./.agents/skills or $HOME/.agents/skills" >&2
exit 1
fi
fi
Algorithm Design Review
Overview
Review algorithm proposals before implementation hardens them. Focus on assumptions, invariants, complexity, and where the design can fail.
Checklist
- State inputs, outputs, and operating assumptions.
- Identify invariants and the mechanism that maintains them.
- Estimate complexity and likely bottlenecks.
- Compare against the strongest baseline alternatives.
Deliverables
- design review memo
- risks and failure modes list
- recommended next prototype or proof task
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 39 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A c5a4e5f5112c
algorithm-design-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository sillyDaibo/reasflow-dev (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 281 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…