Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/sillydaibo/reasflow-dev/interactive-vs-auto-executionnpx skills add sillyDaibo/reasflow-dev --skill interactive-vs-auto-executiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sillyDaibo/reasflow-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sillydaibo/reasflow-dev/interactive-vs-auto-execution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sillydaibo/reasflow-dev/interactive-vs-auto-execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sillydaibo/reasflow-dev/interactive-vs-auto-execution.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00434 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00217 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00087 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
interactive-vs-auto-execution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Installed Root
Resolve the installed reasflow-dev private skills root before running packaged scripts:
REASFLOW_PRIVATE_SKILLS_ROOT="${REASFLOW_PRIVATE_SKILLS_ROOT:-}"
if [ -z "$REASFLOW_PRIVATE_SKILLS_ROOT" ]; then
if [ -d ./.codex/reasflow-skills ]; then
REASFLOW_PRIVATE_SKILLS_ROOT="$(pwd)/.codex/reasflow-skills"
elif [ -d "$HOME/.codex/reasflow-skills" ]; then
REASFLOW_PRIVATE_SKILLS_ROOT="$HOME/.codex/reasflow-skills"
else
echo "reasflow private skills not found in ./.codex/reasflow-skills or $HOME/.codex/reasflow-skills" >&2
exit 1
fi
fi
Interactive Vs Auto Execution
Overview
Choose execution mode deliberately. Interactive runs pause at meaningful approval points; unattended runs keep moving with explicit assumptions and a clear audit trail.
Interactive Mode
- Stop when a choice would materially change scope, outputs, cost, or interpretation.
- Present the recommended default plus the alternatives that matter.
- Wait for confirmation before launching major downstream work.
Unattended Mode
- Continue only when the user explicitly asked not to wait or the current workflow says unattended execution is expected.
- Pick the safest reasonable default from the prompt, workspace, and prior artifacts.
- Record assumptions, default choices, and any follow-up checks needed in the handoff.
Domain Reminders
- survey: lock topic framing, coverage axes, language, and outputs before full generation
- intro: verify title, style, and source evidence before drafting claims
- algorithm: surface ambiguous method choices before implementation and toy validation
- experiment: pause for expensive or controversial protocols unless unattended execution was requested
- paper: confirm template or chapter-map shifts before final assembly when a human is present
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 45 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A aaa547dda42c
interactive-vs-auto-execution is a skill published in the GitHub repository sillyDaibo/reasflow-dev (2 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 434 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…