contract-drafting-and-review-guidance-china-law

contract-drafting-and-review-guidance-china-law is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from simbajigege/book2skills. It costs 36 tokens per session (3,913 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A structured method for drafting and reviewing contracts under Chinese law, based on the Chinese "三观四步法" approach. It helps organize the deal, contract terms, procedures, performance, breaches, disputes, and signing requirements.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review or draft contracts, plan a transaction before writing documents, rewrite clauses, or create China-law contract checklists.
Why use it?
It gives contract reviews a repeatable checklist for finding missing terms and legal or business risks, while making clear that it is not a substitute for a licensed lawyer or current legal research.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review or draft contracts, plan a transaction before writing documents, rewrite clauses, or create China-law contract checklists.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/simbajigege/book2skills/contract-drafting-and-review-guidance-china-law
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add simbajigege/book2skills --skill contract-drafting-and-review-guidance-china-law
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/simbajigege/book2skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for contract-drafting-and-review-guidance-china-law

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/simbajigege/book2skills/contract-drafting-and-review-guidance-china-law/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/simbajigege/book2skills/contract-drafting-and-review-guidance-china-law)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/simbajigege/book2skills/contract-drafting-and-review-guidance-china-law"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/simbajigege/book2skills/contract-drafting-and-review-guidance-china-law/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for contract-drafting-and-review-guidance-china-law

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/simbajigege/book2skills/contract-drafting-and-review-guidance-china-law"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/simbajigege/book2skills/contract-drafting-and-review-guidance-china-law.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 36 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,913 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00036 $0.03913
Opus 5 $0.00018 $0.01956
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00783
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00391

Measured 12d ago against content hash a332fde231ce, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

contract-drafting-and-review-guidance-china-law scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

skills/contract-drafting-and-review-guidance-china-law/SKILL.md · 353 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 353 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Overview

This skill applies the Chinese contract drafting and review method known as "三观四步法" from 合同起草审查指南 (T/CAB 0121-2021). It helps lawyers, in-house counsel, business operators, and legal students structure contract review, draft contract frameworks, identify risks, and produce review comments under a China-law lens.

This skill is a workflow and checklist tool. It does not replace current legal research or advice from a licensed lawyer.

When to Use This Skill

  • The user asks to review a contract, draft a contract, or identify contract risks.
  • The user asks how to structure a transaction before drafting documents.
  • The user asks whether a contract form, clause order, or clause wording is appropriate.
  • The user asks for a checklist for contract parties, subject matter, procedures, performance, breach, dispute resolution, or signing requirements.
  • The contract is governed by PRC law or the user asks for China-law contract drafting logic.

HOW TO USE THIS SKILL

  1. Identify the user's task: contract review, contract drafting, deal-structure design, clause rewrite, or checklist generation.
  2. Ask only for missing facts that are necessary: contract type, user role, transaction purpose, counterparty identity, subject matter, price/payment, timeline, and special risk tolerance.
  3. Apply the four-step process: communicate needs -> analyze through three perspectives -> review -> submit.
  4. Analyze in this order: macro transaction structure -> meso contract structure -> micro clause wording.
  5. If legal validity depends on current statutes, regulatory approvals, judicial interpretations, or local rules, tell the user to verify current law or consult qualified counsel.

CITATION RULES

Every substantive claim based on the guide's methodology must include a citation to the original text.

Quote files (load the relevant one):

  • contract-drafting-quotes.md: definitions of macro, meso, micro analysis; drafting principles; transaction structure; parties; three-points-one-line method.
  • contract-review-quotes.md: the complete 三观四步法 statement, review principles, transaction-structure framing, and comprehensive review.

Read the full file on GitHub · 353 lines

Files

What ships with it

4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 353 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A a332fde231ce

Subscribe to this mod's changes

contract-drafting-and-review-guidance-china-law is a skill published in the GitHub repository simbajigege/book2skills (163 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 3,913 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.