Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add simiancraft/simiancraft-skills --skill fix-github-issuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/simiancraft/simiancraft-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/simiancraft/simiancraft-skills/fix-github-issue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/simiancraft/simiancraft-skills/fix-github-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/simiancraft/simiancraft-skills/fix-github-issue/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/simiancraft/simiancraft-skills/fix-github-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/simiancraft/simiancraft-skills/fix-github-issue.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00161 | $0.01658 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00064 | $0.00663 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00332 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
fix-github-issue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fix GitHub Issue
One issue in, one outcome out: merged, parked, handed-off, closed, dlq, or failed
when it ran, and left-alone, busy, not-run, stopped, or lease-lost when it did not
settle the issue (references/pipeline.md says what each means). Internally it is a worker, then
a review, then a landing, revising until the issue's review budget is spent.
Invoked by burn-down-github-issues (one call per Ready card) and walk-the-floor (the repair
after an incident), both through fixIssue.
The pipeline is shared; the repository is config. Nothing here is copied into a repository. Everything true of a repository (remotes, branches, commands, path aliases, invalidation paths) lives in a config file at that repository's root, and the pipeline refuses to start without one, naming the missing file and the fields it lacks.
Every stage takes an explicit context rather than reading module state, so one process can run two
pipelines against two configurations without either seeing the other's queue, seats (the roles an
agent fills: worker, reviewer, confirmer), or run directory. That is what makes fixIssue
callable as the fix seat of a larger loop.
When to use it
- One issue you already believe is real and small enough, to be fixed unattended.
- As the fix stage of another driver: import
lib/pipeline.tsand callfixIssue(ctx, issue, { maxPoints }), building the context withlib/context.ts.
Skip it for an issue you are working interactively, for anything blocked on a product decision, and for work whose remedy is a judgement call rather than a change.
Run it
From inside the target repository (any directory of it, including a worktree):
bun run <this-skill-dir>/fix.ts --issue <n>
bun run <this-skill-dir>/fix.ts --issue <n> --dry-run
bun run <this-skill-dir>/fix.ts --issue <n> --max-points 8 # raise the size ceiling for this issue only
bun run <this-skill-dir>/fix.ts --issue <n> --worker codex:gpt-5.6-sol --reviewer claude:claude-opus-5
bun run <this-skill-dir>/fix.ts --issue <n> --confirmer claude:claude-opus-5 # the seat that re-checks a close the worker proposes
bun run <this-skill-dir>/fix.ts --issue <n> --redrive # lift a park or a dead letter and continue the issue's pull request
bun run <this-skill-dir>/fix.ts --issue <n> --resume-pr <pr> # continue that open pull request rather than open another
What ships with it
40 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- fix.ts 13 KB runs code
- fix.usage.test.ts 962 B runs code
- lib/agent.timeout.test.ts 9.5 KB runs code
- lib/agent.ts 19 KB runs code
- lib/blockers.ts 2.1 KB runs code
- lib/callbacks.ts 4.0 KB runs code
- lib/cli.drivers.test.ts 2.5 KB runs code
- lib/cli.test.ts 1.2 KB runs code
- lib/cli.ts 1.8 KB runs code
- lib/config.ts 18 KB runs code
- lib/context.ts 7.1 KB runs code
- lib/control-files.ts 1.2 KB runs code
- lib/engines.ts 3.1 KB runs code
- lib/fixture-runner.ts 1.5 KB runs code
- lib/follow-base.test.ts 5.3 KB runs code
- lib/follow-base.ts 3.9 KB runs code
- lib/labels.test.ts 6.6 KB runs code
- lib/labels.ts 19 KB runs code
- lib/lane-work.test.ts 12 KB runs code
- lib/lane.ts 11 KB runs code
- lib/pid-lock.test.ts 2.8 KB runs code
- lib/pid-lock.ts 2.6 KB runs code
- lib/pipeline.checks.test.ts 13 KB runs code
- lib/pipeline.dry-run.test.ts 3.6 KB runs code
- lib/pipeline.failures.test.ts 677 B runs code
- lib/pipeline.landing-line.test.ts 4.8 KB runs code
- lib/pipeline.source.test.ts 1.7 KB runs code
- lib/pipeline.ts 96 KB runs code
- lib/pool.ts 1.1 KB runs code
- lib/resume.ts 12 KB runs code
- lib/shell.ts 7.3 KB runs code
- lib/staleness.test.ts 4.5 KB runs code
- lib/staleness.ts 8.0 KB runs code
- lib/stop.test.ts 3.7 KB runs code
- lib/stop.ts 2.8 KB runs code
- lib/stopping.test.ts 12 KB runs code
- prompts/confirm-answer.md 2.2 KB
- prompts/review.md 11 KB
- prompts/triage-and-fix.md 14 KB
- references/pipeline.md 24 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 112 lines · 161 tokens per session scan A ef12b9a90587
fix-github-issue is a skill published in the GitHub repository simiancraft/simiancraft-skills (8 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 161 tokens to every session and 1,658 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-20.
Other skills, from other repositories
avi-pr-flow
Automate PR workflow with commit, push, create PR, and review cycle.
pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
phx-pr-review
Address feedback left on a GitHub pull request: fetch unresolved review threads, make agreed Elixir/Phoenix code fixes, reply, and resolve. Use for a PR URL/number or reviewer comments. NOT for pre-PR review, findings triage, or CI monitoring.
signing-preflight
Before the first commit of a session, check that commit signing will work — the key is loaded and unlocked — and ask the operator to unlock it once, up front, instead of discovering it after a hundred unsigned commits. Never disables signing silently, never re-signs history without asking. Use at the start of…
pr-review
Review pull requests and Git diffs with Graph-It-Live risk, breaking-change, dependency-impact, cycle, unused-export, and test-candidate evidence. Use when asked to review a PR, inspect a diff, assess merge risk, check a branch before merging, create a Graph-It-Live review gate, or explain review-pr results. Trigger…
loop-gh-pr
A recipe for a scheduled GitHub pull-request watcher. It checks open pull requests for new activity and prepares read-only review drafts without posting comments or merging anything.