Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add sina-heidariaan/cold-run --skill grant-diffgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sina-heidariaan/cold-runWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sina-heidariaan/cold-run/grant-diff)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sina-heidariaan/cold-run/grant-diff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sina-heidariaan/cold-run/grant-diff.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.02145 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.01073 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00429 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00215 |
Grade A, and why
grant-diff scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 149 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 626adc109f93
grant-diff is a skill published in the GitHub repository sina-heidariaan/cold-run (0 stars, last pushed 16d ago), with no licence file. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 2,145 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
llm-as-judge-evaluation
Evaluate LLM outputs using frontier models as judges. Use for pairwise model comparison, quality scoring with custom rubrics, and automated evaluation pipelines. Covers position bias mitigation, statistical significance, and generating preference data for DPO/RLHF.
hugging-face-evaluation
Add and manage evaluation results in Hugging Face model cards. Supports extracting eval tables from README content, importing scores from Artificial Analysis API, and running custom model evaluations with vLLM/lighteval. Works with the model-index metadata format.
skill-optimizer
Use when creating, running, debugging, or documenting skill-optimizer workbench evals; working with agent skill cases, suites, graders, traces, Docker workspaces, OpenRouter model matrices, or the skill-optimizer SDK/CLI.
Use this skill when a task requires reading, creating, splitting, merging, or otherwise manipulating PDF files.
mle-workflow
Production ML engineering workflow — data contracts, reproducible training, evaluation gates, deployment, and monitoring. Use when building, reviewing, or hardening ML systems beyond notebooks.
llm-evaluator
Evaluate LLM outputs systematically using LLM-as-judge, human evaluation frameworks, and regression testing. Use when assessing model quality, comparing models, or preventing quality regression.