Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add skael-dev/skael --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skael-dev/skaelWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skael-dev/skael/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skael-dev/skael/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skael-dev/skael/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skael-dev/skael/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skael-dev/skael/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00227 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00091 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
code-review
When to use
Use this skill when asked to review code changes, pull requests, or files for quality issues.
Process
- Read the changed files completely before commenting
- Check for correctness bugs first
- Check for security issues (injection, auth bypass, data exposure)
- Check for maintainability (naming, structure, complexity)
- Provide specific, actionable feedback with line references
Principles
- Be specific: "line 42: this SQL query is vulnerable to injection" not "watch out for SQL injection"
- Suggest fixes, don't just point out problems
- Acknowledge good patterns when you see them
- Prioritize: blocking issues first, then improvements, then style
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 31 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 6d5d9dfdef8a
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository skael-dev/skael (16 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 227 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
crit-cli
Use when an agent needs to author or reply to crit inline comments programmatically (including multi-agent workflows commenting on shared code/plans/docs/proposals), publish or unpublish a crit review with crit share, sync a crit review to or from a GitHub PR or GitLab MR, or read/interpret a crit review JSON file.…
crit
Review code changes, a plan, a live page (running dev server), or a local HTML file with Crit inline comments and structured human feedback. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /crit or directly asks to use Crit; a generic review request does not count.
crit-story
Author a crit story and continue the interactive review loop only when the user explicitly invokes crit-story or directly asks you to generate a crit story. Do not infer this skill from generic review, PR, or diff-review requests.
ai-architect-review
Review the architecture of a system that calls a language model. Use when adding an agent loop, a retrieval path, a tool surface, or an MCP server to a codebase; when a system that worked in a demo is being prepared for production; or when asked to audit, review, or plan AI/agent architecture. Checks the four…
github-code-review
Comprehensive GitHub pull-request code review with multi-agent coordination. Use when reviewing a PR or diff, auditing changes for correctness/security/style before merge, or generating actionable inline review comments.
meta-reviewing-ai-reviewing
AI integration review patterns. Use when reviewing model API calls, prompt construction, LLM output handling, RAG pipelines, and tool-calling code. Covers prompt-injection call-chain tracing, output validation, stop reasons, token budgets, retry and timeout handling, streaming, and key/PII exposure.