Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add SKB3002/agenthub --skill systematic-debugginggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SKB3002/agenthubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skb3002/agenthub/systematic-debugging)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skb3002/agenthub/systematic-debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skb3002/agenthub/systematic-debugging/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skb3002/agenthub/systematic-debugging"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skb3002/agenthub/systematic-debugging.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00610 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00244 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00122 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
systematic-debugging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 110 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 53b60eed01a4
systematic-debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository SKB3002/agenthub (4 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 610 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
linux
Linux administration and networking diagnostics — DNS, load balancing, VPCs, kernel tuning, and connectivity troubleshooting.
chaos
Design, run, and debug Chaos Engineering experiments on Kubernetes using Litmus Chaos v3 and Chaos Mesh v2. Covers fault injection (pod-delete, network-loss, CPU stress, node-drain), steady-state hypothesis probes, GameDay runbooks, scheduled experiments, DORA feedback loop, and RBAC setup. Use when asked to "inject a…
debug
Structured platform troubleshooting — classifies the problem layer, collects evidence, forms a root-cause hypothesis, and proposes a fix with validation and rollback steps.
ia-c-systems
C patterns for systems code, libraries, and native extensions: module layout, function decomposition, status-enum errors, memory safety, undefined behavior, and performance measurement. Use when writing, reviewing, refactoring, or debugging C, working with malloc lifetimes, buffer overflows, sanitizers, or Valgrind…
ia-verification-before-completion
Enforces fresh verification evidence before any completion claim. Use when about to claim "tests pass", "bug fixed", "done", "ready to merge", handing off work, or before editing when a request has ambiguous scope.
debugging
Systematic root-cause debugging: reproduce, investigate, hypothesize, fix with verification. Use when asked to "debug this", "fix this bug", "why is this failing", "troubleshoot", or mentions errors, stack traces, broken tests, flaky tests, regressions, or unexpected behavior.