critique

critique is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup. It costs 107 tokens per session (2,506 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of critique, MIT.

A design-review command that evaluates an HTML artifact across five areas: overall approach, visual hierarchy, detail, working behaviour, and originality. It produces a self-contained HTML report with scores, evidence, and suggested actions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a webpage, prototype, or other HTML artifact, compare design variants, and prioritise practical visual and functional changes.
Why use it?
It turns a broad request for design feedback into a consistent review that points to specific things to keep, fix, or improve quickly.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup/critique
Any agent
npx skills add skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup --skill critique
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for critique

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup/critique.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup/critique)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup/critique"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup/critique.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 107 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,506 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00107 $0.02506
Opus 5 $0.00053 $0.01253
Sonnet 5 $0.00021 $0.00501
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00251

Measured 5d ago against content hash 8727e6489d80, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-05, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

critique scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to critique — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/skills/critique/SKILL.md · 259 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 259 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Critique Skill · 5 维度专家评审

Produce a single-file HTML "design review report" that scores any artifact across 5 dimensions and proposes actionable fixes. Inspired by the huashu-design expert-critique flow.

When to use

  • After the agent (or user) generates an artifact (deck / prototype / landing page) and the user asks "what's wrong with this?" or "review this"
  • As a self-check loop the agent can run on its own output before emitting it
  • For comparing two variants of the same design

What you produce

A single self-contained <artifact type="text/html"> review report including:

  1. Header — what artifact was reviewed, date, reviewer ("OD · Critique skill"), 1-line verdict
  2. Radar chart (inline SVG, no library) showing the 5 scores
  3. Five dimension cards, each with:
    • Score 0–10 (with band: 0–4 Broken · 5–6 Functional · 7–8 Strong · 9–10 Exceptional)
    • 1-paragraph evidence (cite specific elements / files / lines)
    • One Keep / Fix / Quick-win bullet
  4. Combined action lists at the bottom:
    • Keep — what's working, don't touch
    • Fix — P0 / P1 issues that are visually expensive
    • Quick wins — 5–15 minute tweaks with disproportionate impact

The 5 dimensions

Each dimension is independent — a deck can be 9/10 on Innovation but 4/10 on Hierarchy and the report should say so plainly. Don't average away interesting failures.

1. Philosophy consistency · 哲学一致性

Does the artifact pick a clear direction and stick to it through every micro-decision (chrome / kicker / spacing / accent)?

Evidence to look for:

  • Is there one declared design direction (e.g. Monocle / WIRED / Kinfolk) or is it three styles in a trench coat?
  • Does the chrome / kicker vocabulary stay in one register, or does page 3 say "Vol.04 · Spring" and page 7 say "BUT WAIT 🔥"?
  • Are accent / serif / mono used by the same rule throughout?

0–4 Three styles fighting each other. 5–6 One direction but half the elements drift. 7–8 Coherent, occasional drift on edge pages. 9–10 Every element argues for the same thesis.

Read the full file on GitHub · 259 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 259 lines · 107 tokens per session scan A 8727e6489d80

Subscribe to this mod's changes

critique is a skill published in the GitHub repository skeletorflet/opencode-supreme-setup (47 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 107 tokens to every session and 2,506 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to critique, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens

chronicle

Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…

microsoft/vscode · 72 tokens