Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add SkillDoAI/skilldo --skill testifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SkillDoAI/skilldoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skilldoai/skilldo/testify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skilldoai/skilldo/testify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skilldoai/skilldo/testify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skilldoai/skilldo/testify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skilldoai/skilldo/testify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.03052 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.01221 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00610 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00305 |
Grade A, and why
testify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 446 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 907900f3f669
testify is a skill published in the GitHub repository SkillDoAI/skilldo (2 stars, last pushed 25d ago), with no licence file. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 3,052 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-17.
Other skills, from other repositories
golang-testing
Go testing best practices including table-driven tests, test helpers, benchmarking, race detection, coverage analysis, and integration testing patterns. Use when writing or improving Go tests.
setup
Wire Ginkgo into a Go package — install the ginkgo CLI and Ginkgo+Gomega, ginkgo bootstrap to generate the suitetest.go (TestXxx/RegisterFailHandler(Fail)/RunSpecs), the package xxxtest convention, dot-import alternatives (aliased import, dsl/ subpackages, --nodot), ginkgo generate, and testing.T interop via…
timeouts-and-async
Make Ginkgo specs interruptible and test asynchronous behavior — SpecContext/context.Context cancellable nodes, NodeTimeout/SpecTimeout/GracePeriod, the --timeout flag, Abort and SIGINT behavior, Gomega Eventually/Consistently (the func(g Gomega) form, .WithContext), and the defer GinkgoRecover() rule for goroutines.…
eng-test-conventions
Go test-shape discipline for Compozy. Use when writing or editing test.go under cmd or internal after test placement is justified. Do not use for non-Go tests, fixture-only changes, or as a replacement for eng-consolidate-test-suites.
overview
The Ginkgo mental model for writing Go tests — the one idea that explains everything (Ginkgo builds a spec tree at construction time, then runs it) and its consequences for how you write specs, plus spec independence and the node taxonomy. Use this first when you start working with Ginkgo in a project, or to decide…
golang-testing
Production-ready Golang tests — table-driven tests, testify suites and mocks, parallel tests, fuzzing, fixtures, goroutine leak detection with goleak, snapshot testing, code coverage, integration tests, idiomatic test naming. Use when writing or reviewing Go tests, choosing a testing approach, setting up Go test CI…