Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add skilletmd/skillet --skill pr-handoffgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skilletmd/skilletWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skilletmd/skillet/pr-handoff)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skilletmd/skillet/pr-handoff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skilletmd/skillet/pr-handoff/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skilletmd/skillet/pr-handoff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skilletmd/skillet/pr-handoff.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00907 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00453 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00181 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
pr-handoff scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
pr-handoff
Write your PR description once, correctly, on the first submission — so reviewers don't have to ask basic questions. The most common review round-trips are: missing test steps, unclear scope, and no security flag. This skill closes all three.
When to use
Before running git pr create or gh pr create on any pull request. Takes 2–3 minutes to fill in; typically saves one full review round-trip.
Step 1 — Gather the facts
Run these commands first:
# What changed
git diff main...HEAD --stat
# Commits on this branch
git log main...HEAD --oneline
# Does this PR touch security-sensitive surfaces?
git diff main...HEAD --name-only | grep -iE "auth|sign|cred|token|secret|key|password|crypto"
Step 2 — Fill the template
Copy this template and replace every <...> placeholder:
## What changed
- <first bullet: what was added, changed, or removed — be specific about files/modules>
- <second bullet if needed>
## Why
<The problem this solves or the requirement it fulfills. Link to the issue or spec section if applicable.>
## How to test locally
```bash
# 1. Install deps
<your install command, e.g. pnpm install>
# 2. Build
<your build command>
# 3. Run the relevant tests
<your test command, e.g. pnpm test path/to/test>
# 4. Manual verification
<step-by-step commands to see the change working>
Expected output:
<paste expected output here>
Acceptance criteria
- All existing tests pass
- New tests added for changed behavior
- No type errors (
<your typecheck command>) - Manual test steps above produce expected output
Security review required?
Yes — security review required before merge. This PR touches: <list the sensitive surfaces>.
No — This PR does not touch auth, signing, credentials, file writes, or trust policy.
Related
Closes #
- Depends on: (none / #)
- Follow-up: (none / #)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 126 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A ec0f236804ef
pr-handoff is a skill published in the GitHub repository skilletmd/skillet (3 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 907 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
gentle-ai-collab-perfect
Trigger: contributing to Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai as an external collaborator. Strict issue-first workflow, honest PR bodies, contributor-vs-maintainer scope, chained-PR strategy, verification protocol, docstring coverage. Load whenever the active repo is Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai and any part of the…
branch-pr
Create Gentle AI pull requests with issue-first checks. Trigger: creating, opening, or preparing PRs for review.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
chained-pr
Trigger: PRs over 400 lines, stacked PRs, review slices. Split oversized changes into chained PRs that protect review focus.
github-release-briefing-skill
Create a source-linked briefing for the latest published GitHub release of a public repository. Use for engineering teams tracking a dependency release; do not use it to publish releases or change repositories.
ijfw-ship
Use when the user says 'ship it', 'ship this', 'release', 'publish', 'launch', 'deploy', 'go live', 'wrap this up', 'time to ship', or invokes '/ijfw-ship'. Domain-aware release — software (test → tag → push → publish), book (final edit → format → KDP / agent / Substack), campaign (review → schedule → launch →…