Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add skillmds/skillmd --skill competitive-battlecardgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skillmds/skillmdWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skillmds/skillmd/competitive-battlecard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skillmds/skillmd/competitive-battlecard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skillmds/skillmd/competitive-battlecard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skillmds/skillmd/competitive-battlecard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skillmds/skillmd/competitive-battlecard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.00684 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00274 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
competitive-battlecard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to competitive-battlecard — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competitive Battlecard
Create a concise, sales-ready battlecard for use against a specific competitor.
Context
You are creating a competitive battlecard for $ARGUMENTS.
Use web search to research the competitor's current product, pricing, positioning, and recent changes. If the user provides files (feature lists, win/loss data, sales call notes), read them first.
Instructions
-
Research the competitor (use web search):
- Current product offerings and features
- Pricing tiers and model
- Target market and positioning
- Recent product launches or changes
- Known strengths and weaknesses
- Customer reviews and sentiment (G2, Capterra, Reddit)
-
Create the battlecard with these sections:
Company Overview
- Founded, HQ, funding/revenue (if public)
- Target market and ICP
- Positioning in one sentence
Quick Comparison
Capability Us Them Winner [Feature area 1] [Our approach] [Their approach] [Us/Them/Tie] [Feature area 2] ... ... ... Pricing ... ... ... Support ... ... ... Where We Win
- [Advantage 1]: [Proof point or customer quote]
- [Advantage 2]: [Specific capability they lack]
- [Advantage 3]: [Better approach with reasoning]
Where They Win
- [Their strength 1]: [Our counter-positioning]
- [Their strength 2]: [How we mitigate this gap]
Common Objections & Responses
Prospect Says Respond With "Competitor X has [feature]" "[Our alternative approach and why it's better for them]" "They're cheaper" "[Value framing: total cost of ownership, ROI, hidden costs]" "They're more established" "[Our advantages: speed, innovation, focus, support]" Landmines to Plant
Questions to ask the prospect that highlight competitor weaknesses:
- "How important is [area where we excel] to your team?"
- "Have you evaluated [specific capability they lack]?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 79 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 292b8f6e14dd
competitive-battlecard is a skill published in the GitHub repository skillmds/skillmd (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 684 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to competitive-battlecard, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
slopless
Use Slopless to review English Markdown for deterministic AI and human slop signals, including vague phrasing, formulaic prose, weak rhythm, filler, and cliches.
suiko
A Japanese writing and review workflow for checking whether text sounds uniform, translated, unnatural, or difficult to read. It supports writing and editing documents such as reports, guides, meeting notes, proposals, and emails.
poly-lint-and-format
Running poly lint / poly fmt — --fix, --format pretty|json|toon, --exclude, --config, exit codes, inline suppression, and the check → read-json → fix → re-check loop.
poly-orchestrator
Use poly as the single lint/format gate instead of invoking ruff/oxlint/rustfmt directly — one poly.toml, poly hooks install, poly migrate, CI via the Goldziher/poly setup Action.
poly-mcp
The poly MCP server — the eleven tools and which are read-only vs mutating, the paths/exclude/config/format params, async Tasks for the whole-project phase, and the isError contract.
poly-tiers-and-scope
Five mechanisms decide what actually inspects a file (crates/poly-core/src/registry.rs).