Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add skillmds/skillmd --skill competitive-battlecardgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skillmds/skillmdWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skillmds/skillmd/competitive-battlecard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skillmds/skillmd/competitive-battlecard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skillmds/skillmd/competitive-battlecard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skillmds/skillmd/competitive-battlecard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skillmds/skillmd/competitive-battlecard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.00684 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00274 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
competitive-battlecard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to competitive-battlecard — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Competitive Battlecard
Create a concise, sales-ready battlecard for use against a specific competitor.
Context
You are creating a competitive battlecard for $ARGUMENTS.
Use web search to research the competitor's current product, pricing, positioning, and recent changes. If the user provides files (feature lists, win/loss data, sales call notes), read them first.
Instructions
-
Research the competitor (use web search):
- Current product offerings and features
- Pricing tiers and model
- Target market and positioning
- Recent product launches or changes
- Known strengths and weaknesses
- Customer reviews and sentiment (G2, Capterra, Reddit)
-
Create the battlecard with these sections:
Company Overview
- Founded, HQ, funding/revenue (if public)
- Target market and ICP
- Positioning in one sentence
Quick Comparison
Capability Us Them Winner [Feature area 1] [Our approach] [Their approach] [Us/Them/Tie] [Feature area 2] ... ... ... Pricing ... ... ... Support ... ... ... Where We Win
- [Advantage 1]: [Proof point or customer quote]
- [Advantage 2]: [Specific capability they lack]
- [Advantage 3]: [Better approach with reasoning]
Where They Win
- [Their strength 1]: [Our counter-positioning]
- [Their strength 2]: [How we mitigate this gap]
Common Objections & Responses
Prospect Says Respond With "Competitor X has [feature]" "[Our alternative approach and why it's better for them]" "They're cheaper" "[Value framing: total cost of ownership, ROI, hidden costs]" "They're more established" "[Our advantages: speed, innovation, focus, support]" Landmines to Plant
Questions to ask the prospect that highlight competitor weaknesses:
- "How important is [area where we excel] to your team?"
- "Have you evaluated [specific capability they lack]?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 79 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 292b8f6e14dd
competitive-battlecard is a skill published in the GitHub repository skillmds/skillmd (143 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 684 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to competitive-battlecard, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.
competitive-battlecard compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| competitive-battlecardskillmds/skillmd | Skill | 143 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| sloplessberelevant-ai/slopless | Skill | 339 | 3d ago | MIT | A | 40 | Claude Code, Codex |
| suikonwiizo/suiko | Skill | 115 | yesterday | MIT | A | 192 | Codex |
| poly-lint-and-formatGoldziher/poly | Skill | 20 | today | MIT | A | 42 | Claude Code |
| poly-orchestratorGoldziher/poly | Skill | 20 | today | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code |
| poly-mcpGoldziher/poly | Skill | 20 | today | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code |
| poly-tiers-and-scopeGoldziher/poly | Skill | 20 | today | MIT | A | 60 | Claude Code |