Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add skloxo/TideTrading --skill bottleneck-huntergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skloxo/TideTradingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/bottleneck-hunter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/bottleneck-hunter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/bottleneck-hunter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/bottleneck-hunter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/bottleneck-hunter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00145 | $0.02683 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00058 | $0.01073 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00537 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00268 |
Grade A, and why
bottleneck-hunter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to bottleneck-hunter — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 191 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Supply-Chain Bottleneck Hunter
Decompose a super-trend (user-specified, e.g. "AI infrastructure", "energy transition") into its physical supply chain and hunt for bottleneck-arbitrage opportunities.
Core Idea
Don't ask "which AI stock to buy" — ask "if this trend keeps expanding, which link runs out first?"
Traditional research chases leaders and known tracks. This skill inverts: start from the choke points of the physical supply chain and find companies nobody notices but that the whole industry must wait on when they run short.
The edge: Layer-1 bottlenecks (GPU, HBM, power) are already priced in. The real alpha is in Layer 2 and Layer 3 — optical modules, lasers, InP substrates, SOI wafers, epitaxy equipment, wafer-level test, IC substrates, specialty fiberglass.
Step 1: Super-Trend Confirmation
Trend Filter Criteria
| Criterion | Requirement | How to verify |
|---|---|---|
| Durability | ≥3-5 years of certain growth | Search industry forecasts, capex plans |
| Physicality | Needs real hardware/material/equipment build | Distinguish "software upgrade" from "physical expansion" |
| Scale | Global capex >$50B/year | Search top players' capex guidance |
| Acceleration | Demand growth > supply expansion | Compare demand growth vs capacity plans |
Use web_search to verify. Reference super-trends: AI infrastructure, energy transition (nuclear/grid/storage), defense modernization, semiconductor reshoring, space economy.
Step 2: Physical Supply-Chain Decomposition
Don't stop at concepts — decompose to physical entities.
Layer 0 (end): final product/service
Layer 1 (core component): already closely watched → priced in, limited alpha
Layer 2 (sub-component/material): low attention, alpha-rich
Layer 3 (upstream equipment/raw material)
Layer 4 (infrastructure): power, cooling, land, talent, certifications
AI Infrastructure Example
Layer 0: AI model training/inference services
Layer 1: GPU/accelerators, HBM, servers, data centers
Layer 2 (focus zone):
- Network interconnect: optical modules, fiber, switch ASICs, copper cables
- Optical comms core: lasers (EML/VCSEL/CW), modulators, photodetectors
- Semiconductor materials: InP substrates, GaAs substrates, SOI wafers, SiC substrates
- Advanced packaging: CoWoS interposers, HBM TSV, ABF substrate film
- PCB/substrate: high-frequency PCB, IC substrates, specialty fiberglass
- Test: wafer-level test (probe cards), burn-in, ATE
- Thermal/cooling: liquid cooling, CDU, immersion fluid
- Power connection: busbars, UPS, distribution, transformers
Layer 3: epitaxy equipment (MOCVD/MBE), lithography/etch, high-purity metals (In/Ga/Ge), specialty gases, sputtering targets, certifications (MSA/Telcordia)
Layer 4: power (nuclear/gas/transmission), cooling water, data-center land/permits
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 191 lines · 145 tokens per session scan A 2b8063b29992
bottleneck-hunter is a skill published in the GitHub repository skloxo/TideTrading (13 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 145 tokens to every session and 2,683 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to bottleneck-hunter, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
crest-compete
Competitive analysis ending in a clear positioning call — where to play, how to win. Use when asked to "analyze competitors", "competitive landscape", "how do we compare to X", "competitive positioning", "where should we play", "find our white space", or "who else does this".
proof-strategy
Produce a test strategy for a project or feature — risk map, test type decisions, coverage targets, CI config. Use when asked to "create test strategy", "what should we test", "testing plan", or "improve test coverage".
crest-narrative
Strategic narrative — write a standalone strategy memo that frames product direction, bets, and rationale for a planning horizon. Use when asked to "write a strategy doc", "product vision", "strategic narrative", "company strategy memo", "planning memo", or "explain our product direction".
crest-okr
OKR design — create objectives and key results with a North Star metric, input metrics tree, and cadence. Use when asked to "set OKRs", "define our objectives", "what should we measure this quarter", "design our OKR framework", "build a metrics tree", or "what's our North Star".
crest-recon
Strategic context reconnaissance — read existing roadmaps, OKRs, competitive docs, and briefs to establish context before planning. Use when asked to "understand our strategy", "what's the current roadmap", "what OKRs do we have", "strategic context", or before starting any prioritization or roadmap work.
daily-deep-brief
A scheduled, pre-market investment briefing for Hong Kong and United States stocks. A deterministic preparation step gathers data and an agent adds judgment, while a later step validates and publishes the result.