Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add skloxo/TideTrading --skill convertible-bondgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skloxo/TideTradingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/convertible-bond)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/convertible-bond"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/convertible-bond/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/convertible-bond"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/convertible-bond.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.02747 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00025 | $0.01373 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00549 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00275 |
Grade A, and why
convertible-bond scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to convertible-bond — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 260 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
A股可转债分析
概述
A股可转债是具有"债底保护+股票期权"特征的混合品种。本skill覆盖可转债三维估值、条款博弈分析、双低策略和轮动选债框架。
可转债基础概念
核心要素
| 要素 | 说明 | 示例 |
|---|---|---|
| 面值 | 100元 | - |
| 票面利率 | 递增,通常0.3%-2.0% | 第1年0.4%...第6年2.0% |
| 转股价 | 转换成股票的价格 | 转股价15.00元 |
| 到期期限 | 通常6年 | 2024-2030 |
| 到期赎回价 | 面值+最后一年利息+补偿 | 110-115元 |
| 回售条款 | 股价持续低于转股价70%可回售 | 连续30个交易日中30天<70% |
| 强赎条款 | 股价持续高于转股价130%可强赎 | 连续30个交易日中15天>130% |
| 下修条款 | 可以下调转股价 | 连续30个交易日中15天<85% |
关键指标
转股价值 = 面值 / 转股价 × 正股价格
= 100 / 15.00 × 18.00 = 120.00元
转股溢价率 = (转债价格 - 转股价值) / 转股价值 × 100%
= (125 - 120) / 120 × 100% = 4.17%
纯债价值 = Σ(票息 / (1+r)^t) + 到期赎回价 / (1+r)^n
≈ 85-95元(取决于剩余期限和利率)
纯债溢价率 = (转债价格 - 纯债价值) / 纯债价值 × 100%
三维估值体系
1. 纯债价值(债底)
def bond_floor(coupon_rates: list, years_remaining: float,
redemption_price: float = 110, yield_rate: float = 0.03) -> float:
"""
Args:
coupon_rates: 剩余各年票面利率列表,如 [0.8, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0]
years_remaining: 剩余年限
redemption_price: 到期赎回价
yield_rate: 折现率(同期信用债收益率,约2.5-4%)
Returns:
纯债价值
"""
pv = sum(c * 100 / (1 + yield_rate)**i for i, c in enumerate(coupon_rates, 1))
pv += redemption_price / (1 + yield_rate)**len(coupon_rates)
return pv
纯债价值含义:
- 纯债价值越高 → 债底保护越强 → 下跌空间有限
- 通常纯债价值在 85-100 之间
- 转债价格跌到纯债价值附近 = "债性转债",安全但弹性小
2. 转股价值(股性)
转股价值 = 100 / 转股价 × 正股当前价
影响因子:
- 正股价格(正相关)
- 转股价(负相关)
- 下修转股价 → 转股价值上升
3. 期权价值
期权价值 = 转债价格 - max(纯债价值, 转股价值)
期权价值高 → 市场看好正股上涨潜力 或 看好下修概率
期权价值低/负 → 便宜(可能有机会)
三维判断矩阵
| 转股价值 | 纯债价值 | 转债类型 | 策略 |
|---|---|---|---|
| >120 | 不重要 | 偏股型 | 跟随正股,关注强赎风险 |
| 100-120 | 不重要 | 平衡型 | 进可攻退可守,最佳区间 |
| <100 | >90 | 偏债型 | 持有吃利息,等下修/正股反弹 |
| <80 | <85 | 困境型 | 高风险,可能有信用风险 |
条款博弈分析
下修博弈
触发条件:连续30个交易日中15天正股收盘价低于当期转股价的85%。
下修概率评估:
1. 触发条件已满足/接近满足 → 高概率
2. 大股东持有大量转债未转股 → 高概率(有动力下修)
3. 公司即将面临回售 → 高概率(下修避免回售)
4. 公司现金充裕、无还债压力 → 低概率(无动力下修)
5. 转股会大幅稀释股权 → 低概率(控制权顾虑)
下修后影响:
- 转股价值 = 100 / 新转股价 × 正股价,通常瞬间上升
- 转债价格通常上涨 5-15%
- 但正股可能因稀释预期下跌
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 260 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 7c21db592505
convertible-bond is a skill published in the GitHub repository skloxo/TideTrading (10 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 2,747 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to convertible-bond, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
daily-deep-brief
A scheduled, pre-market investment briefing for Hong Kong and United States stocks. A deterministic preparation step gathers data and an agent adds judgment, while a later step validates and publishes the result.
hk-stock-analysis
A workspace-aware analysis workflow for Hong Kong-listed stocks. It retrieves prices, technical indicators, market comparisons, and news through a local data pipeline, then adds Hong Kong-specific investment context.
us-stock-analysis
Workspace-aware US stock analysis for kcn. Routes through clawock analyze-us / clawock us-quotes instead of generic web search, then layers fundamental/technical/news analysis on top. Use when user asks to analyze a US ticker (e.g. "analyze AAPL", "look at RKLB", "compare TSLA vs NVDA"), check earnings, run…
invest-analyst
A framework for producing professional investment research, including company reports, industry studies, event analysis, analyst-expectation reviews, comparisons, and market summaries. It connects several investment research workflows into one process.
invest-fund
A Chinese-language guide for analysing investment funds, with different workflows for comparing funds, reviewing ETFs, examining new funds, and studying industry funds.
invest-stock
A stock-analysis workflow for companies listed in China, Hong Kong, or the United States. It chooses an analysis style based on the market and whether the user requests a deeper valuation review.