Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add skloxo/TideTrading --skill corporate-eventsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skloxo/TideTradingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/corporate-events)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/corporate-events"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/corporate-events/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/corporate-events"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/corporate-events.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.02933 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01466 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00587 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00293 |
Grade A, and why
corporate-events scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to corporate-events — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 269 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
公司事件驱动分析
概述
通过公司层面的重大事件（并购、增减持、股权激励、再融资等）构建事件驱动交易策略。核心逻辑：事件公告包含增量信息，市场消化需要时间，事件前后存在系统性超额收益。
适用场景：
- 并购重组套利（A股借壳/资产注入/吸收合并）
- 大股东/高管增减持的信号提取
- 股权激励的行权价与解锁条件分析
- 定增/配股/可交债的折价套利
- ST/*ST/退市预警的规避与投机
核心概念
并购套利（Merger Arbitrage）
A股并购特色：
| 类型 | 频率 | 超额收益 | 风险 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 借壳上市 | 低(注册制后减少) | 高(30-100%) | 极高(审批失败) |
| 资产注入 | 中 | 中(10-30%) | 高(估值/审批) |
| 吸收合并 | 低 | 低(5-15%) | 低(已达协议) |
| 要约收购 | 低 | 低(3-8%) | 最低 |
价差计算：
并购套利价差 = (要约价 - 当前价) / 当前价
年化收益 = 价差 / 预计完成时间(年)
示例:
A公司要约收购B公司, 要约价25元, B当前股价23.5元
价差 = (25 - 23.5) / 23.5 = 6.38%
预计3个月完成, 年化 = 6.38% × 4 = 25.5%
风险评估:
审批确定性: 已获商务部/证监会预审 → 高确定性
对价方式: 现金 > 股票+现金 > 纯股票 (确定性递减)
交易条件: 是否有MAC条款(重大不利变化)
A股并购套利要点：
- 停牌制度改革后，复牌首日涨跌幅受限（创业板/科创板20%）
- 关注"筹划重大资产重组"公告 → 停牌 → 复牌的节奏
- 审批链：董事会 → 股东大会 → 证监会（每一步都是风险点）
分拆/Spin-off
A股分拆上市条件:
- 上市满3年
- 子公司净利润 ≥ 母公司净利润10%
- 子公司净资产 ≤ 母公司净资产30%
交易策略:
预案公告 → 买入母公司（分拆预期提升估值）
子公司上市 → 择机卖出母公司（利好兑现）
实例:
2023年某科技公司分拆子公司至科创板
预案公告后母公司20日涨幅18%
子公司上市首日后母公司回调8%
大股东增减持信号
增持信号（看多）：
| 信号强度 | 条件 | 超额收益(20日) |
|---|---|---|
| 强 | 控股股东增持 > 总股本1% | +8~12% |
| 中 | 高管集体增持(≥3人) | +5~8% |
| 弱 | 单一董事/监事增持 | +2~4% |
减持信号（看空）：
| 信号强度 | 条件 | 超额收益(20日) |
|---|---|---|
| 强 | 控股股东计划减持 > 总股本2% | -5~10% |
| 中 | 解禁后首次减持 | -3~6% |
| 弱 | 高管离职减持 | -2~4% |
关键窗口期:
- 公告前6个月: 内幕交易高发区，异常放量可能是先知资金
- 公告后3日: 信息冲击最大
- 公告后20日: 超额收益基本消化
过滤规则:
排除: 被动减持(质押平仓)、大宗交易折价减持(可能是换手不是看空)
保留: 竞价减持(真正看空)、增持后短期再减持(反向信号)
股权激励解读
关键要素:
1. 行权价/授予价: 相对当前股价的折价率
折价 > 50% → 激励力度大但可能摊薄严重
折价 < 20% → 管理层对股价有信心
2. 解锁条件: 业绩目标是否有挑战性
例: "未来3年净利润复合增长率≥20%"
vs 行业平均增长率10% → 条件较高 → 正面信号
3. 激励对象: 核心技术人员占比
核心技术人员 > 50% → 绑定核心人才 → 正面
纯管理层 → 可能是利益输送
4. 股份来源:
定向增发 → 摊薄每股收益
回购 → 不摊薄，更正面
5. 等待期/解锁期:
等待期1年+解锁期3年 → 标准方案
等待期短+解锁条件低 → 利益输送嫌疑
A股实证:
激励方案公告后60日平均超额收益: +6.2%
解锁条件超预期的: +10.5%
行权价接近当前价的: +8.3%
首次推出激励 > 再次推出: 超额收益更高
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 269 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 09b8570c6663
corporate-events is a skill published in the GitHub repository skloxo/TideTrading (10 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 2,933 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to corporate-events, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
daily-deep-brief
A scheduled, pre-market investment briefing for Hong Kong and United States stocks. A deterministic preparation step gathers data and an agent adds judgment, while a later step validates and publishes the result.
hk-stock-analysis
A workspace-aware analysis workflow for Hong Kong-listed stocks. It retrieves prices, technical indicators, market comparisons, and news through a local data pipeline, then adds Hong Kong-specific investment context.
us-stock-analysis
Workspace-aware US stock analysis for kcn. Routes through clawock analyze-us / clawock us-quotes instead of generic web search, then layers fundamental/technical/news analysis on top. Use when user asks to analyze a US ticker (e.g. "analyze AAPL", "look at RKLB", "compare TSLA vs NVDA"), check earnings, run…
portfolio-swarm-review
Multi-agent swarm review of kcn's current holdings. Inspired by TauricResearch/TradingAgents framework already in workspace — three-tier analysis (analysts → bull/bear debate → risk debate + judge) with confidence scoring. Use for post-close reviews, holiday/next-session planning, pre-add sizing decisions, and any…
invest-analyst
A framework for producing professional investment research, including company reports, industry studies, event analysis, analyst-expectation reviews, comparisons, and market summaries. It connects several investment research workflows into one process.
invest-fund
A Chinese-language guide for analysing investment funds, with different workflows for comparing funds, reviewing ETFs, examining new funds, and studying industry funds.