Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add skloxo/TideTrading --skill correlation-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skloxo/TideTradingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/correlation-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/correlation-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/correlation-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/correlation-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/correlation-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.10442 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.04177 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.02088 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.01044 |
Grade A, and why
correlation-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to correlation-analysis — 95 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Correlation and Cointegration Analysis
Overview
Correlation analysis is a foundational tool for pairs trading, portfolio construction, and risk management. This skill covers four analysis modes (co-movement discovery / return-correlation deep dive / sector clustering / realized correlation), a full cointegration-testing framework, cross-market linkage analysis, and the complete workflow from analytics to pair-trading signals.
Mode 1: Co-Movement Discovery
Use case: Given a target asset, scan a universe for highly correlated assets and build a candidate pool with similar industry or factor exposure, for use in pairs trading or substitute identification.
Workflow
1. Pull daily return series for the target asset and N candidates
2. Compute Pearson / Spearman correlations between the target and each candidate
3. Rank by correlation in descending order and keep Top-K (usually K=10-20)
4. Run cointegration tests on the Top-K set to retain pairs with real long-run equilibrium
5. Output the candidate pool and a correlation summary
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
from scipy.stats import pearsonr, spearmanr
def scan_correlated_assets(
target_returns: pd.Series,
universe_returns: pd.DataFrame,
top_k: int = 20,
min_corr: float = 0.5,
method: str = "pearson",
) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Scan for assets that are highly correlated with the target asset.
Args:
target_returns: Daily return series for the target asset
universe_returns: Candidate-universe return matrix, columns are symbols
top_k: Number of top candidates to return
min_corr: Minimum absolute-correlation threshold
method: "pearson" or "spearman"
Returns:
A DataFrame containing symbol / corr / p_value / rank
"""
aligned = universe_returns.dropna(axis=1, how="any")
aligned, target_aligned = aligned.align(target_returns, join="inner", axis=0)
results = []
for col in aligned.columns:
if method == "spearman":
corr, p = spearmanr(target_aligned, aligned[col])
else:
corr, p = pearsonr(target_aligned, aligned[col])
results.append({"symbol": col, "corr": corr, "p_value": p})
df = pd.DataFrame(results)
df = df[df["corr"].abs() >= min_corr].sort_values("corr", ascending=False)
df["rank"] = range(1, len(df) + 1)
return df.head(top_k).reset_index(drop=True)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 1,124 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A c32e341ef8f7
correlation-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository skloxo/TideTrading (13 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 10,442 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to correlation-analysis, differing in 95 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
daily-deep-brief
A scheduled, pre-market investment briefing for Hong Kong and United States stocks. A deterministic preparation step gathers data and an agent adds judgment, while a later step validates and publishes the result.
hk-stock-analysis
A workspace-aware analysis workflow for Hong Kong-listed stocks. It retrieves prices, technical indicators, market comparisons, and news through a local data pipeline, then adds Hong Kong-specific investment context.
us-stock-analysis
Workspace-aware US stock analysis for kcn. Routes through clawock analyze-us / clawock us-quotes instead of generic web search, then layers fundamental/technical/news analysis on top. Use when user asks to analyze a US ticker (e.g. "analyze AAPL", "look at RKLB", "compare TSLA vs NVDA"), check earnings, run…
portfolio-swarm-review
Multi-agent swarm review of kcn's current holdings. Inspired by TauricResearch/TradingAgents framework already in workspace — three-tier analysis (analysts → bull/bear debate → risk debate + judge) with confidence scoring. Use for post-close reviews, holiday/next-session planning, pre-add sizing decisions, and any…
investment-decision
Run a clawock investment decision — read the prepared request, research with the host's own tools, write decision.json with evidence and an explicit bull/bear debate, and let Python validate and settle. Use when the user asks for an investment decision or a clawock run request is present.
portfolio-risk-review
Single-pass holdings analysis for kcn using workspace files and the local fetch chain. Use for portfolio review, position risk ranking, US-HK cross-market read, leverage ETF risk assessment, and one-shot actionable reports based on portfolio.json plus fresh quotes from clawock analyze-us / clawock analyze-hk.