Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add skloxo/TideTrading --skill liquidation-heatmapgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skloxo/TideTradingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/liquidation-heatmap)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/liquidation-heatmap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/liquidation-heatmap/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/liquidation-heatmap"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/liquidation-heatmap.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.02847 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.01139 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00569 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00285 |
Grade A, and why
liquidation-heatmap scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to liquidation-heatmap — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 287 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Liquidation Heatmap & Level Analysis
Overview
Analyze the distribution of leveraged positions and their liquidation price levels to identify zones where forced selling/buying will accelerate price moves. Liquidation clusters act as "magnets" — price tends to be attracted toward large liquidation concentrations because market makers and whales profit from triggering cascading liquidations.
Core Concepts
1. Liquidation Mechanics
How liquidation works:
# Long position liquidation
long_liquidation_price = entry_price * (1 - 1/leverage + maintenance_margin)
# Short position liquidation
short_liquidation_price = entry_price * (1 + 1/leverage - maintenance_margin)
# Example: BTC long at $65,000, 10x leverage, 0.5% maintenance margin
# Liquidation: $65,000 * (1 - 1/10 + 0.005) = $58,825
# A 9.5% move against the position triggers liquidation
Leverage and liquidation distance:
| Leverage | Liquidation Distance (Long) | Liquidation Distance (Short) |
|---|---|---|
| 2x | ~50% drop | ~50% rise |
| 5x | ~20% drop | ~20% rise |
| 10x | ~10% drop | ~10% rise |
| 20x | ~5% drop | ~5% rise |
| 50x | ~2% drop | ~2% rise |
| 100x | ~1% drop | ~1% rise |
2. Liquidation Heatmap Interpretation
A liquidation heatmap shows where liquidation orders are concentrated across different price levels, typically color-coded by density.
Reading the heatmap:
Price Level Long Liquidations Short Liquidations Interpretation
$70,000 ░░░░░░░░░░ ████████████████ Heavy short liquidation zone
$68,000 ░░░░ ██████████ Moderate short liquidation
$66,000 ███████ ███████ Balanced (current price area)
$64,000 ██████████ ░░░░ Moderate long liquidation
$62,000 ████████████████ ░░░░░░░░░░ Heavy long liquidation zone
Key principles:
- Liquidation clusters are magnets: price tends to gravitate toward large liquidation pools because the forced orders provide liquidity for whales to fill their positions
- Liquidation cascades: when a cluster gets hit, the forced selling/buying pushes price further, potentially triggering the next cluster → cascade effect
- After liquidation wipe: once a large cluster is liquidated, that price level often becomes support/resistance (overleveraged positions are gone)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 287 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 8677b93adb63
liquidation-heatmap is a skill published in the GitHub repository skloxo/TideTrading (13 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,847 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to liquidation-heatmap, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
investment-analysis
Multi-agent investment research and analysis system by Tododeia. Use when the user wants market analysis, investment research, or a summary of current opportunities across crypto, stocks, forex, and commodities. Spawns 5 specialized research agents (4 sector + 1 strategy), adapts to user risk profile, tracks…
daily-deep-brief
A scheduled, pre-market investment briefing for Hong Kong and United States stocks. A deterministic preparation step gathers data and an agent adds judgment, while a later step validates and publishes the result.
hk-stock-analysis
A workspace-aware analysis workflow for Hong Kong-listed stocks. It retrieves prices, technical indicators, market comparisons, and news through a local data pipeline, then adds Hong Kong-specific investment context.
us-stock-analysis
Workspace-aware US stock analysis for kcn. Routes through clawock analyze-us / clawock us-quotes instead of generic web search, then layers fundamental/technical/news analysis on top. Use when user asks to analyze a US ticker (e.g. "analyze AAPL", "look at RKLB", "compare TSLA vs NVDA"), check earnings, run…
portfolio-swarm-review
Multi-agent swarm review of kcn's current holdings. Inspired by TauricResearch/TradingAgents framework already in workspace — three-tier analysis (analysts → bull/bear debate → risk debate + judge) with confidence scoring. Use for post-close reviews, holiday/next-session planning, pre-add sizing decisions, and any…
investment-decision
Run a clawock investment decision — read the prepared request, research with the host's own tools, write decision.json with evidence and an explicit bull/bear debate, and let Python validate and settle. Use when the user asks for an investment decision or a clawock run request is present.