Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add skloxo/TideTrading --skill research-goalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skloxo/TideTradingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/research-goal)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/research-goal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/research-goal/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/research-goal"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/skloxo/tidetrading/research-goal.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00618 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00309 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
research-goal scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to research-goal — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 58 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Goal-Driven Finance Research
Use this skill when a user asks for a multi-step finance research task, comparison, audit, thesis review, or "keep working until the answer is supported." The goal runtime is for research only. Never use it to place, submit, or execute trades.
When to Attach a Goal
Start a goal when the task has any of these traits:
- It needs multiple criteria before a conclusion is credible.
- It compares strategies, assets, regimes, or evidence sources.
- It may continue across turns or require a final audit.
- The user asks for "long driven task", "goal", "审计", "对比", "研究结论", or similar.
Do not start a goal for a tiny one-shot answer unless the user explicitly asks.
Tool Flow
- Call
start_research_goalwith a concise research-only objective. - Include 3-5 acceptance criteria when the user provided enough context.
- Before continuing an existing task, call
get_research_goal. - After a market-data lookup, backtest, document read, web source, or manual reasoning step, call
add_goal_evidence. - Link evidence to a criterion using
criterion_idorcriterion_index. - When all required criteria have been audited, call
update_research_goal_status.
Criteria Template
Use this shape when the user did not provide criteria:
- Define the research-only thesis and symbol universe.
- Collect fresh market, benchmark, or artifact evidence.
- Compare alternatives or a control baseline.
- Record caveats, contradictions, and the non-advice boundary.
Evidence Rules
- Keep evidence short and concrete.
- Prefer artifact-backed evidence when a tool produced a run or file.
- Include
run_id,artifact_path,source_provider,source_type,symbol_universe,benchmark, anddata_as_ofwhen known. tool_call_idis traceability only. Completion needs verified evidence from an existingrun_idor an allowedartifact_pathwith a matching sha256 hash.- Do not mark live trading instructions as evidence. Refuse or reframe them as research-only analysis.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 58 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A eeaf0bb21cbf
research-goal is a skill published in the GitHub repository skloxo/TideTrading (10 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 618 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to research-goal, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
daily-deep-brief
A scheduled, pre-market investment briefing for Hong Kong and United States stocks. A deterministic preparation step gathers data and an agent adds judgment, while a later step validates and publishes the result.
hk-stock-analysis
A workspace-aware analysis workflow for Hong Kong-listed stocks. It retrieves prices, technical indicators, market comparisons, and news through a local data pipeline, then adds Hong Kong-specific investment context.
us-stock-analysis
Workspace-aware US stock analysis for kcn. Routes through clawock analyze-us / clawock us-quotes instead of generic web search, then layers fundamental/technical/news analysis on top. Use when user asks to analyze a US ticker (e.g. "analyze AAPL", "look at RKLB", "compare TSLA vs NVDA"), check earnings, run…
portfolio-swarm-review
Multi-agent swarm review of kcn's current holdings. Inspired by TauricResearch/TradingAgents framework already in workspace — three-tier analysis (analysts → bull/bear debate → risk debate + judge) with confidence scoring. Use for post-close reviews, holiday/next-session planning, pre-add sizing decisions, and any…
invest-analyst
A framework for producing professional investment research, including company reports, industry studies, event analysis, analyst-expectation reviews, comparisons, and market summaries. It connects several investment research workflows into one process.
invest-fund
A Chinese-language guide for analysing investment funds, with different workflows for comparing funds, reviewing ETFs, examining new funds, and studying industry funds.