Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/plugin install ruby-grape-railsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/document)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/document"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/document/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/document"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails/document.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00749 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00300 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00150 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
rb:document scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Document
Generate documentation for newly implemented features.
Usage
/rb:document .claude/plans/magic-link-auth/plan.md
/rb:document magic link authentication
/rb:document # Auto-detect from recent plan
Iron Laws
- Never remove existing documentation — Existing docs may reflect design intent that isn't obvious from code alone; update rather than replace
- YARD/RDoc on every public class/module — Undocumented code accumulates quickly and creates onboarding friction for new team members
- ADRs capture the "why", not the "what" — Code shows what was built; ADRs explain why this approach was chosen over alternatives
- Match docs to method's public API — Document parameters, return values, and edge cases; callers shouldn't need to read the implementation
What Gets Documented
| Output | Description |
|---|---|
| Class/module docs | For new classes/modules missing documentation |
| Method docs | For public methods without docs |
| README section | For user-facing features |
| ADR | For significant architectural decisions |
Workflow
Step 0: Pre-check (avoid no-op runs)
Run ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/bin/resolve-base-ref → 3 KEY=value lines
on stdout (BASE_REF, REMOTE, DEFAULT_BRANCH). Substitute the
values into subsequent Bash commands: run
git merge-base HEAD BASE_REF_VALUE and capture the result.
Run git diff --name-only --diff-filter=A MERGE_BASE_VALUE HEAD -- '*.rb'
to list new Ruby files added on the current branch.
If NO new .rb files were added (only modifications), skip the full
audit and report: "No new modules — documentation coverage unchanged."
This prevents 35-message analysis sessions that conclude "PASS" with
zero output (confirmed: session bb0a0454 wasted ~2K tokens on no-op).
- Identify new modules from recent commits or plan file
- Check documentation coverage (YARD, RDoc)
- Generate missing docs using templates
- Add README section if user-facing feature
- Create ADR if architectural decision was made
- Write report to
.claude/plans/{slug}/docs/{feature}.md
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 84 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 25a656add7df
rb:document is a skill published in the GitHub repository slbug/claude-ruby-grape-rails (7 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 749 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
activerecord
This skill should be used when the user asks to "write a migration", "add a column", "add column to table", "create an index", "add a foreign key", "set up associations", "fix N+1 queries", "optimize queries", "add validations", "create callbacks", "use eager loading", or mentions ActiveRecord, belongsto, hasmany…
draper-decorators
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a decorator", "write a decorator", "move logic into decorator", "clean logic out of the view", "isn't it decorator logic", "test a decorator", or mentions Draper, keeping views clean, or representation logic in decorators. Should also be used when editing…
rspec
This skill should be used when the user asks to "write specs", "create spec", "add RSpec tests", "fix failing spec", or mentions RSpec, describe blocks, it blocks, expect syntax, test doubles, or matchers. Should also be used when editing spec.rb files, working in spec/ directory, planning implementation phases that…
dragonruby
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a game", "make a game", "game development", "dragonruby", "drgtk", "game loop", "tick method", "sprite rendering", "game state", or mentions args.outputs, args.state, args.inputs, coordinate system, collision detection, animation frames, or scene management.…
mcp-server
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create an MCP server", "build MCP tools", "define MCP prompts", "register MCP resources", "implement Model Context Protocol", or mentions the mcp gem, MCP::Server, MCP::Tool, JSON-RPC transport, stdio transport, or streamable HTTP transport. Should also be used when…
ratatui-ruby
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a TUI", "terminal interface", "terminal UI", "ratatui", "ratatui-ruby", "inline viewport", "full-screen terminal app", "terminal widgets", "tui.draw", "tui.pollevent", or mentions RatatuiRuby.run, managed loop, terminal rendering, Tea MVU, or building CLI…