Happy is a mobile, web, and desktop client that lets people use Claude Code and Codex remotely from their computers and mobile devices. It is for developers who want encrypted access to coding-agent sessions, including notifications and switching between devices. The catalogue add-ons extend the workflows available in this client.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to slopus/happy. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/slopus/happy/main/.agents/skills/control-flow/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/slopus/happyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/slopus/happy/control-flow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/slopus/happy/control-flow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/slopus/happy/control-flow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/slopus/happy/control-flow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/slopus/happy/control-flow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- Snyk pass
- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.00630 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00252 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
control-flow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/control-flow — Analyze and design control flows and data structures
Read the relevant source code and produce ASCII tree diagrams inside ```txt blocks.
Format
- Each user action or IO event is a separate tree root
- Real function names and types — never invent
- Payload shapes as TypeScript types, not prose
- State mutations: which fields change, what triggers
- Re-render chain: which components and why
- Cross-package when the flow spans app → CLI → server
- Compact — skip trivial pass-throughs, show decisions
Example:
User taps "Archive"
│
├─ handleActionPress(action: SessionActionItem)
│ └─ onClose() → setActionsAnchor(null)
│
├─ sessionKill(sessionId: string)
│ ├─ POST /api/sessions/:id/kill
│ └─ → { success: boolean, message?: string }
│
└─ deleteSession(sessionId)
├─ mutates: sessions, sessionMessages, gitStatus, fileCache
├─ rebuilds: sessionListViewData
└─ re-renders: SessionsListWrapper (data ref changed)
For data structures, show the shape and what depends on it:
SessionRowData (flat primitives, cheap deep-equal)
├─ id, name, subtitle, avatarId ← identity + display
├─ state: SessionState ← collapsed from presence + agentState + thinking
├─ hasDraft: boolean ← collapsed from draft string
├─ activeAt?: number ← only inactive sessions (avoids heartbeat diffs)
├─ machineId, path, homeDir ← grouping in ActiveSessionsGroup
└─ completedTodosCount, totalTodosCount
│
consumed by:
├─ SessionItem → renders purely from props, no store hooks
├─ ActiveSessionsGroup → groups by machineId + path
└─ useDeepEqual → 12 primitive comparisons vs full Session tree
Principles
- Expressive yet compact — every line earns its place
- Show payload SHAPE not description
- Show state mutations → which store fields, what rebuilds
- Show re-render chain → component + reason
- Pseudo code only for branching logic between nodes
- Always output inside ```txt for alignment
- File:line refs when helpful, not mandatory — the flow matters more than the location
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 76 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 23685ef26c17
control-flow is a skill published in the GitHub repository slopus/happy (24,335 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 630 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
kanban-orchestrator
Kanban orchestrator: decompose, route, verify. No executing.
arch-check
An architecture and implementation review tool that examines how a codebase is modeled, divided into responsibilities, organized into modules, and connected by dependencies. It also checks for issues such as circular dependencies, over-design, and violations of common design principles.
gh-merge
Completes the AgentsMesh GitHub pull-request workflow: commits scoped changes, rebases on the authoritative GitHub branch, opens or reuses a PR, monitors required checks, fixes failures, and merges only after verification. Use when the user asks to merge, submit, or land repository changes.
github-gitlab-mirror
Audits or synchronizes the authoritative GitHub main branch to the internal GitLab mirror without importing GitLab-only history back into GitHub. Use when checking GitHub/GitLab consistency, updating the internal mirror, or resolving a divergence between the two remotes.
e2e
Selects and runs the appropriate AgentsMesh end-to-end suite for Web, Desktop, MCP, or iOS, including worktree-specific environment setup and browser-level verification. Use when a change needs E2E coverage, a user asks to execute or diagnose an E2E test, or a cross-service workflow must be verified against the real…
co-evolution
General-purpose co-evolution for questions, ideas, drafts, plans, specs, arguments, and markdown documents. Composes or bounces content between agents using [CONTESTED]/[CLARIFY] markers until it converges. Triggers on "co-evolution", "co-evolve", "co evolve", "bounce", "bounce document", "agent bouncer", "refine with…