Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/smallnest/goal-workflow/humanize-itnpx skills add smallnest/goal-workflow --skill humanize-itgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smallnest/goal-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/smallnest/goal-workflow/humanize-it)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/smallnest/goal-workflow/humanize-it"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/smallnest/goal-workflow/humanize-it.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00152 | $0.01926 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00076 | $0.00963 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00385 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00193 |
Grade A, and why
humanize-it scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 167 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Humanize-It: 迭代式去 AI 味改写
对指定文档进行去 AI 味的改写。根据文本类型和内容,从三个子 skill 中自动选择最合适的一个开始改写。如果改写效果不满意,换用另一个 skill 继续迭代,直到效果达标或达到 42 次迭代上限。
子 Skill 能力矩阵
| Skill | 适用场景 | 核心能力 | 改写风格 |
|---|---|---|---|
| humanizer-zh | 通用文本、文章、博客、文案 | 识别 24+ AI 写作模式,注入个性与灵魂,节奏变化 | 自然、有温度、带观点 |
| humanize-chinese | 通用 + 学术 + 长文本 | 20+ 规则检测 + 统计特征 + LR 融合评分,CLI 工具链 | 多种风格可选(知乎/小红书/学术/文学等) |
| technical-writing | 技术文档、架构说明、设计稿、评审文档 | 去除技术黑话,证据先行,消除主持腔 | 平实、严谨、可论证 |
工作流程
第一步:读取文档并分析
- 读取用户指定的文档内容
- 判断文档类型:
- 技术文档(技术方案、架构说明、设计文档、评审稿)→ 优先使用
technical-writing - 学术论文(论文、研究文章)→ 优先使用
humanize-chinese(学术模式) - 通用文本(博客、文案、文章)→ 优先使用
humanizer-zh - 长文本(≥1500 字)→ 优先使用
humanize-chinese(长文本模式)
- 技术文档(技术方案、架构说明、设计文档、评审稿)→ 优先使用
第二步:改写策略选择
根据文档类型选择第一个改写 skill:
文档类型判断:
├── 技术文档 → technical-writing → humanizer-zh → humanize-chinese
├── 学术论文 → humanize-chinese(academic) → humanizer-zh → technical-writing
├── 通用文本 → humanizer-zh → humanize-chinese → technical-writing
└── 长文本(≥1500字) → humanize-chinese(longform) → humanizer-zh → technical-writing
第三步:迭代改写循环
iteration = 0
MAX_ITERATIONS = 42
while iteration < MAX_ITERATIONS:
iteration += 1
# 使用当前 skill 进行改写
result = humanize(current_text, current_skill)
# 评估改写效果
score = evaluate(result)
if score >= PASS_THRESHOLD:
# 改写效果达标,输出最终结果
output(result)
break
# 效果不达标,切换到下一个 skill
current_skill = next_skill(skill_order)
current_text = result # 在上次改写基础上继续优化
if all_skills_exhausted():
# 所有 skill 都用过一轮,从头开始新一轮组合
current_skill = first_skill(skill_order)
第四步:质量评估
每次改写后,按以下维度评估效果(百分制):
| 维度 | 权重 | 评估标准 |
|---|---|---|
| AI 痕迹去除 | 30% | 三段式、套话、机械连接词是否消除 |
| 自然度 | 25% | 读起来是否像人写的,节奏是否自然 |
| 信息完整 | 20% | 核心信息是否保留,没有丢失关键内容 |
| 风格一致 | 15% | 语气是否前后统一,符合文档类型 |
| 可读性 | 10% | 句子是否通顺,逻辑是否清晰 |
评分标准:
- ≥ 80 分:通过,输出结果
- 60-79 分:尚可,再迭代一轮看能否提升
- < 60 分:不达标,必须继续改写
第五步:输出结果
输出最终改写结果,附带:
- 改写后的完整文本(写入原文件或指定输出文件)
- 改写摘要(使用了哪些 skill,迭代了几次,最终评分)
- 主要改动点列表
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 167 lines · 152 tokens per session scan A b364a0337a68
humanize-it is a skill published in the GitHub repository smallnest/goal-workflow (274 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 152 tokens to every session and 1,926 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
mass-line
触发:当你需要收集多方意见、把零散反馈整合成可执行方案,或把方案带回真实使用者/执行者验证时调用;常见信号包括 stakeholder input、user feedback、意见汇总、对齐与验证。 English: Trigger when input must be gathered from many people, synthesized into a clearer plan, and returned to the affected users or executors for validation. Use this skill for a collect-synthesize-validate loop.
workflows
触发:当你面临的任务明显需要多个思想武器协作时调用;常见信号包括:从零启动新项目、攻坚复杂疑难问题、对已有方案进行迭代优化。此 skill 提供标准化的跨 skill 工作流组合,解决"应该先用哪个 skill、怎么衔接"的问题。 English: Trigger when a task clearly requires multiple skills in sequence. Use this skill to select a standard workflow that chains skills together, defines data handoff between steps, and specifies…
concentrate-forces
触发:当多个任务同时争夺时间、注意力、算力或预算,必须确定主攻方向并停止分散用力时调用;常见信号包括优先级过多、资源紧张、推进分散、需要决定先做什么。 English: Trigger when limited resources are being split across too many tasks and one main target must be chosen. Use this skill to concentrate effort, sequence work decisively, and finish a meaningful breakthrough before expanding.
protracted-strategy
触发:当目标长期、任务复杂、资源暂时处于劣势,或短期无法速胜但又不能放弃时调用;常见信号包括 long-term effort、phased plan、endurance、战略耐心、需要分阶段推进。 English: Trigger when the work is long-horizon, difficult, and unlikely to be won quickly. Use this skill to divide the effort into stages, keep strategic confidence, and accumulate small wins into overall victory.
practice-cognition
触发:当你提出了方案、假设或判断,需要通过实践验证、试错迭代或复盘升级认知时调用;常见信号包括 experiment、prototype、validate、iterate、feedback loop。 English: Trigger when an idea, hypothesis, or plan must be tested in practice and improved through iteration. Use this skill to move from action to understanding and back to action in a spiral learning loop.
contradiction-analysis
触发:当问题复杂、存在多个冲突因素、优先级不清,或你不知道应该先解决什么时调用;常见信号包括 trade-off、瓶颈、根因不明、主次不清、多个问题互相牵制。 English: Trigger when a problem contains competing forces, unclear priorities, or no obvious entry point. Use this skill to identify contradictions, isolate the principal contradiction, classify its nature, and choose the right response.