implementation-comparison

implementation-comparison is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from smartfrog/opencode-froggy. It costs 18 tokens per session (273 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A process for comparing multiple candidate implementations of the same software task. It runs them from the same starting code, checks them against the same acceptance examples, and selects or combines the results using evidence.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when an orchestrator ticket calls for comparing approaches, especially when risk, complexity, or review quality matters.
Why use it?
It makes implementation choices fairer and reduces the chance of choosing an option based only on opinion. It keeps alternatives available until the selected result has been checked.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it when an orchestrator ticket calls for comparing approaches, especially when risk, complexity, or review quality matters.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/smartfrog/opencode-froggy/implementation-comparison
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add smartfrog/opencode-froggy --skill implementation-comparison
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smartfrog/opencode-froggy

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for implementation-comparison

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/smartfrog/opencode-froggy/implementation-comparison/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/smartfrog/opencode-froggy/implementation-comparison)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/smartfrog/opencode-froggy/implementation-comparison"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/smartfrog/opencode-froggy/implementation-comparison/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for implementation-comparison

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/smartfrog/opencode-froggy/implementation-comparison"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/smartfrog/opencode-froggy/implementation-comparison.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 18 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 273 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00018 $0.00273
Opus 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00109
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00004 $0.00055
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00027

Measured 11d ago against content hash e3d0b8856dc2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

implementation-comparison scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skill/implementation-comparison/SKILL.md · 15 lines

What it actually says

Implementation Comparison

Use comparisons when evaluating alternatives is worth the additional cost. Apply the orchestrator's usual validation guidance and coordinate the work through backlog-management.

  1. Select useful candidates from the configured pool, honoring any models the user explicitly requested. Use separate branches and worktrees at the same starting SHA for a fair comparison. Adjust parallelism to resources and coordination cost.
  2. Compare candidates against the same acceptance examples and checks. For non-trivial changes, start a fresh code-reviewer session for this comparison and have it assess every candidate. Share that session only within this comparison, including corrections; another independent comparison gets a new reviewer session.
  3. Choose the candidate that best meets acceptance, manages concrete risks, and avoids unnecessary complexity. Own the selection decision, explain it using evidence, and resolve confirmed blocking review findings.
  4. Adopt useful parts from another candidate when the benefit justifies the rework, then validate the resulting code and have the same reviewer check substantive changes. Avoid repeated comparisons or polishing that no longer improves the outcome.
  5. Retain useful alternatives until the selected result is validated. Synchronize and revalidate against newer integration work as needed; clean up discarded workspaces without losing uncommitted work.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago Changed e3d0b8856dc2
  2. 14d ago First seen · 15 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A df393e95d5e0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

implementation-comparison is a skill published in the GitHub repository smartfrog/opencode-froggy (109 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 273 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-11.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens