Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Smirnov-Labs/claude-skills --skill de-sloppinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Smirnov-Labs/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/smirnov-labs/claude-skills/de-slopping)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/smirnov-labs/claude-skills/de-slopping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/smirnov-labs/claude-skills/de-slopping/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/smirnov-labs/claude-skills/de-slopping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/smirnov-labs/claude-skills/de-slopping.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00066 | $0.01218 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00487 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00244 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00122 |
Grade A, and why
de-slopping scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
de-slopping
A finishing pass that strips AI-slop from writing before the reader sees it. Inspired by ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English, the aerospace standard for flight manuals, where one misread sentence can kill someone.
AI prose fails the opposite way. Sentences run long. Claims hedge. Big words do small jobs. Filler sounds like content. This pass removes that. A linter catches the countable slop. I apply the rest by judgment.
When to run it
First classify the text. The mode decides how hard you cut.
- Strict (every rule): PR and commit messages, design docs, READMEs, runbooks, reports, release notes. Any artifact a reader acts on.
- Light (cut slop, hedges, em-dashes, and the swap words; keep voice, rhythm, and normal sentence length): chat replies, explanations, teaching.
- Exempt (do not touch): code, commands, error text, quoted text, file paths, URLs. Those are exact strings.
Full STE strips personality by design. Do not apply strict mode to prose that needs a voice. A de-slop pass with no light mode is a footgun.
The pass
- Classify the text as strict, light, or exempt.
- Run the linter on the draft:
python3 ~/.claude/skills/de-slopping/ste_lint.py <file>, or pipe text on stdin. - Fix every
hardfinding. Judge eachsoftfinding: keep it or cut it. - Apply the judgment rules below.
- Re-run the linter. Confirm zero
hardfindings. - Send the clean text. Stay quiet about the edit unless asked for an audit.
Rules the linter enforces (mechanical)
The linter counts words and matches patterns. It flags:
- Sentences over 25 words. Split them into numbered steps.
- The slop blocklist. Delete on sight:
delve crucial seamless comprehensive robust cutting-edge game-changer tapestry realm plethora myriad elevate foster streamline meticulous intricate pivotal testament - One-word swaps:
utilize, leverage -> use facilitate -> help commence, initiate -> start terminate -> stop prior to -> before in order to -> to additionally, moreover -> also approximately -> about - Stock hedges:
it's important to note it's worth mentioning when it comes to at the end of the day - Every em-dash. Use a comma, a colon, or a period.
- Soft modals (
should,would,may,might): a soft flag. Keepcan,will,must. They commit. - Filler
-ingsuch asmaking it easy to: a soft flag.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 121 lines · 66 tokens per session scan A a919f9af2eb0
de-slopping is a skill published in the GitHub repository Smirnov-Labs/claude-skills (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 66 tokens to every session and 1,218 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-18.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…