Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add smithjoshua/claude-code-cowork-skills-file-organizer --skill claude-code-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smithjoshua/claude-code-cowork-skills-file-organizerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/smithjoshua/claude-code-cowork-skills-file-organizer/claude-code-skill)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/smithjoshua/claude-code-cowork-skills-file-organizer/claude-code-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/smithjoshua/claude-code-cowork-skills-file-organizer/claude-code-skill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/smithjoshua/claude-code-cowork-skills-file-organizer/claude-code-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/smithjoshua/claude-code-cowork-skills-file-organizer/claude-code-skill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.03370 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.01348 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00674 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00337 |
Grade A, and why
file-organizer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 399 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
File Organizer (Claude Code - PARA Method)
Organizes files using the PARA methodology with bash commands. Intelligent categorization and audit trails.
What is PARA?
| # | Category | Contains | Lifespan |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Inbox | New files awaiting processing | Temporary |
| 1 | Projects | Active work with deadlines | Short-term |
| 2 | Areas | Ongoing responsibilities | Long-term |
| 3 | Resources | Reference materials by topic | Evergreen |
| 4 | Archive | Inactive/completed items | Preserved |
Workflow
Phase 1: Discovery → ls, find, file commands to scan and assess
Phase 2: Analysis → Read file contents for poor names (use Read tool for PDFs)
Phase 3: Triage → Create categorization table, flag sensitive/scam files
Phase 4: Preparation → mkdir -p to create PARA structure, get approval
Phase 5: Execution → mv commands with logging
Phase 6: Cleanup → Remove empty folders, delete temp files
Phase 7: Completion → Generate summary, verify PARA folder roots are clean
0-Review Staging Workflow
For large batches of poorly-named files, use a staging folder:
# Create staging folder for files needing content analysis
mkdir -p ~/Downloads/0-Review
# Move cryptic/poorly-named files to review
mv ~/Downloads/U0BPA6*.pdf ~/Downloads/0-Review/
mv ~/Downloads/[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9].pdf ~/Downloads/0-Review/
# Analyze each file, then move to proper PARA location
# Remove staging folder when empty
rmdir ~/Downloads/0-Review
Quick Start
# 1. Create PARA folder structure
mkdir -p ~/Downloads/{0-Inbox/_REVIEW,1-Projects/{Work,Personal},2-Areas/{Finance,Health,Legal,Career},3-Resources/{Media/{Images,Videos,Audio,Screenshots},Tools/{Installers,Utilities},Learning/{Articles,Books,Courses}},4-Archive/{Completed-Projects,Past-Years},_ORG}
# 2. Scan target directory
find ~/Downloads -maxdepth 1 -type f | wc -l
ls -la ~/Downloads | head -50
# 3. Move files (log each operation)
mv "~/Downloads/file.pdf" "~/Downloads/2-Areas/Finance/"
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 399 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 33905f03829f
file-organizer is a skill published in the GitHub repository smithjoshua/claude-code-cowork-skills-file-organizer (58 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 3,370 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
prompt
Organize rough requests into machine-facing prompts, refine existing prompts, and run the task when requested. Use for prompt preparation; edit human-facing prose directly under the applicable writing guidance.
kit-setup
Discover and test optional Claude, Codex, Gemini through Antigravity, and Grok subscription connections. Help with missing CLI or login setup without changing panel defaults.
ask-agents
Ask the specific Claude, Codex, Gemini, or Grok agent the user names and automatically retrieve its response. Use for targeted outside opinions; this does not automatically create a council.
council
Develop independent approaches to a task, decision, plan, or draft, then use a fresh worker to synthesize them. Use for an explicit council request, including dictated counsel. Reviewing existing work routes to adversarial-review.
adversarial-review
Review existing work with independent fresh reviewers and fresh synthesis. Use for an adversarial review, review-plan request, or a requested panel critique of a draft, plan, workflow, argument, or implementation.
kit-hello
Check the installed starter kit, prerequisites, and next step without calling external models.