Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to SNComrade/Rail-Connector-MCP. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SNComrade/Rail-Connector-MCP/main/.agents/skills/rail-reviewer/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SNComrade/Rail-Connector-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/sncomrade/rail-connector-mcp/rail-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sncomrade/rail-connector-mcp/rail-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sncomrade/rail-connector-mcp/rail-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/sncomrade/rail-connector-mcp/rail-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/sncomrade/rail-connector-mcp/rail-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00073 | $0.01709 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00855 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00342 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00171 |
Grade A, and why
rail-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 129 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Rail Connector Reviewer
Use Claude as an independent reviewer, then verify its claims locally. Claude output is evidence, not authority.
Rules
- Use the target project's real same-OS
cwd, not this skill repo unless this MCP itself is under review. - If MCP tools are unavailable, report that a fresh Codex task or restart is needed. Never imply that Claude reviewed something when it did not.
- Ground branch, status, diff, relevant code, docs, and tests before prompting Claude.
- Default report-only reviews to
permissionMode: "dontAsk"when the installed CLI advertises it, passdisallowedTools: ["Edit", "Write", "NotebookEdit"], and include explicit no-edit constraints.dontAskdenies new permission requests while allowing read-only inspection. Useplanonly as a compatibility fallback; never approve implementation from a report-only review. Report-only is verified by pre/post repository evidence; it is not an operating-system sandbox. Constrain shell use to inspection and use a read-only copy when hard isolation matters. tools,allowedTools, anddisallowedToolsconstrain built-in Claude tools only. MCP and connector tools can remain available; the current MCP does not offer a verified strict MCP-config roster. Inspect the effective roster when possible and do not describe the built-in deny list as hard connector isolation.- Leave
trustWorkspacefalse unless the user explicitly authorizes trust after project configuration and hooks are inspected. - Honor an explicit user request for Ultracode with
ultracode: true,confirmUltracode: true, and no ordinary effort. Check capability provenance and calibrated probe exit status plus environment blockers before launch, treating probe timeout or termination as inconclusive, then reportposture.ultracodeAssessmentwithout promotingxhighalone to confirmed Ultracode. Keep the persisted childlaunchEnvironmentseparate fromcurrentMcpEnvironmentwhen a review reconnects after an MCP refresh.advertisedAsEffort: falseorhelpListsUltracode: falsemeans help text is silent, not that the launch is unavailable. ReadultraEffortAttachment.active,lifecycle, andhistoryCoverage: a latest enter is active, a later exit is inactive, and a skipped or partial range is unknown until a later complete transition restores current state. Historical coverage remains partial after recovery. These attachments authenticate client-side transitions, not workflow execution. InspectattentionStatus; a blocking environment, conflicting effort, or terminal-rejection conflict takes precedence without erasing lifecycle evidence. - Honor an explicit user request to test or use bypass only when capability
inspection reports policy enabled and the call includes
confirmBypassPermissions: true. Do not independently elevate and do not silently downgrade an explicit request. - Prefer
submit_promptandwait_for_claude_turn. Use capture for attention states, not as the primary final-report parser. - Keep waiting while
workflowPendingis true even if an assistant completion record is already present. Do not submit follow-up text, rename, replace, or ordinarily stop a session blocked with reasonworkflow_pending. - Treat
workflowObservationUncertain: trueas fail-closed pending evidence. A skipped session-log middle invalidates head-only current posture and cannot prove workflow completion until an explicit observed checkpoint restores certainty. - Read
terminalStateindependently from the combinedstate; active workflow evidence may make the latter busy without proving that Claude's terminal is busy. When workflow pending clears, historical evidence should not remain inworkflowPendingEvidence. - A
tool_userecord is not a final report. ChecktextTruncated,textSha256, andtextCharactersbefore synthesizing an unusually large review. Useget_claude_resultwith the returnedresultIduntilhasMoreis false; treatresultIdas an opaque record identity and verify the separatetextSha256content digest instead of treating the preview as complete. - Remote Control web may label the underlying xhigh setting
Extrawhile UltraCode is active. A session-bound webExtrais compatible presentation, not confirmation or conflict. On an idle, empty composer,/effort ultracodeis current-setting evidence but may change posture and does not prove launch provenance. Use a substantive turn, not a trivial prompt, when workflow activity is part of the review evidence. - Verify Claude's file paths, line references, commands, factual claims, and severity against local evidence before synthesis.
- Default to one Claude reviewer with no delegated workflow. When parallel review is explicitly authorized, copy any user-supplied bounds into the prompt. Without supplied bounds, allow at most 3 workflow agents, one pass, no recursive delegation, 5 findings, 10 minutes, and 200k aggregate tokens; stop and synthesize when any bound is reached.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · +19 lines ee6868375e12
- 10d ago First seen · 110 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A d06d9ca84cb5
rail-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository SNComrade/Rail-Connector-MCP (0 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 1,709 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr-comments
Fetch and display GitHub PR review comments for the current branch.
remarc
Manage Remarc session comments and contextual feedback. Use when the user mentions Remarc sessions, comments, handoff, triage, review, addressing, resolving, status updates, or summaries.
adversarial-verify
Use after completing any substantive piece of work (code change, analysis, document, configuration, answer to a hard question) and BEFORE presenting it as done. Switches you from author to attacker - you try to refute your own work and only present it if it survives. Do not skip because the work "looks clean"…
swift-concurrency-pro
Reviews Swift code for concurrency correctness, modern API usage, and common async/await pitfalls. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing Swift concurrency code.
swiftui-pro
Comprehensively reviews SwiftUI code for best practices on modern APIs, maintainability, and performance. Use when reading, writing, or reviewing SwiftUI projects.
create-skill
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.